dmb
You seem to want to label som the disease, but the only problem with som is
that it dismisses value. Within the MoQ, value is seen as primary.
Marsha
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
dmb,
Marsha:
You seem to want to label som the disease, but the only problem with som is
that it dismisses value. Within the MoQ, value is seen as primary.
Marsha adds:
As far as you reifying the MoQ into the cure RMP wrote:
Remember that the central reality of the MOQ is not an object
Hi all
Just a reminder:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151229584259260set=vb.691124259type=3permPage=1
J A
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
[Ron]
They are beliefs and criticism, but they are based in Bob Pirsigs idea
that we can not only judge other people but other cultures based on
their value of intellectual quality. we most certainly can morally judge
people based on their intellectual
values.
Eddo responds
Marsha said to dmb:
You seem to want to label som the disease, but the only problem with som is
that it dismisses value. Within the MoQ, value is seen as primary.
dmb says:
I want to label SOM the disease? Okay, but that's not my label but an
allusion to Pirsig's descriptions. He talks about
On Aug 27, 2013, at 10:53 PM, david buchanan dmbucha...@hotmail.com wrote:
Marsha said to dmb:
You seem to want to label som the disease, but the only problem with som is
that it dismisses value. Within the MoQ, value is seen as primary.
dmb says:
I want to label SOM the disease? Okay,
