Thanks Dave
I liked that.
Our brains are all different, inorganically, organicallly, mentally and
educationally.
In Syria today, people get shot because they have another view on intellectual
values. I think it's a bad method to solve the conflict. Dialogue, where both
parts are talking AND
2 jun 2011 kl. 18.22 Marsha wrote:
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:08 AM, david buchanan wrote:
dmb says:
I'm saying you don't understand the quote you posted, which was from Wallace
and about James.
Marsha:
Yet concerning the quote I posted YOU wrote: I'm pretty sure Wallace is
wrong on
Hi All
Adam Curtis have made a brilliant series of TV shows at BBC recently
broadcasted (May 23, 30 and June 6 2011).
You can follow it on Youtube. Episode 1 starts here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uz2j3BhL47c. I am not really sure about ep. 3
but it can probably be found on the net
13 jun 2011 kl. 21.06 marsha wrote:
Neat little trick Dan taught me.
Delete.
Better watch your portion of celebrity left Marsha:
Celebrity is to social patterns as sex is to biological patterns. Now he was
getting it. This celebrity is Dynamic Quality within a static social level
got a sense of humour?
Have a nice die
J-A
13 Jun 2011 22:14:39 -0600 Dan wrote:
Hello everyone
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Jan-Anders Andersson
janander...@telia.com wrote:
13 jun 2011 kl. 21.06 marsha wrote:
Neat little trick Dan taught me.
Delete.
J-A:
Better watch
, not an autonomous little homunculus
trying to get a promotion.
Marsha
On Jun 14, 2011, at 4:25 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote:
We all know that Marshas next contribution is not predictable and therefore
dynamic but does she also got a sense of humour?
Have a nice die
J
patterns are these patterns that are NOT static. Not this, not that..
Evolution is a dynamic pattern for ex.
Have a noisy dye
J-A
14 jun 2011 kl. 21.07 skrev moq_discuss-requ...@lists.moqtalk.org:
Hello everyon
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson
janander...@telia.com
patterns are these patterns that are NOT static. Not this, not that..
Evolution is a dynamic pattern for ex.
Have a noisy dye
J-A
14 jun 2011 kl. 21.07 skrev moq_discuss-requ...@lists.moqtalk.org:
Hello everyon
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson
janander...@telia.com
Hi Ham and Steve
The human beings freedom and ability to see and choose between intellectual
values, being superior to social and biological values, is the door to the free
will IMO.
But if we as human intellectuals are bound then to rational reason and
Intellectual thruths and concepts we
16 jun 2011 kl. 11.43 skrev moq_discuss-requ...@lists.moqtalk.org:
J-A:
If all patterns where static there should be no need to specify them as
static. Dynamic patterns are these patterns that are NOT static. Not this,
not that.. Evolution is ?a dynamic pattern for ex.
Dan:
In this
Hi Dan and David
How about spiffing up the old word Quality and start the lecture with
discussing a word like Awesomesauce?
Other words too like celebrity may have a different definition for the
students...
J-A
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
Sorry Marsha and Steve but you are definitely on the wrong way here.
Free will is not an illusion. Free will is the ultimate basic condition for
unpredictability and ever changing identities.
It may be scary to grasp the personal responsibility it takes but without free
will there would be no
, this is your understanding of the way things are. Mine is:
not this, not that.
Marsha
On Jun 20, 2011, at 5:27 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote:
Sorry Marsha and Steve but you are definitely on the wrong way here.
Free will is not an illusion. Free will is the ultimate basic
Hi Marsha
27 jun 2011 kl. 18.44 sMarsha wrote:
Not to be repeating myself, I neither accept the notion of freewill, nor
reject it. Same goes with determinism and causation. I accept that these
are conventional (static) notions, but not Ultimately real. While living
within a
Hello Marsha
Thanks for your humble answer.
28 jun 2011 kl. 15.41 Marsho wrote:
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:40 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote:
Hi Marsha
27 jun 2011 kl. 18.44 sMarsha wrote:
Not to be repeating myself, I neither accept the notion of freewill, nor
reject it. Same goes
Hi Horse
I think it's worse than that. I think that Marsha has an interesting point.
Neither free wiil nor Determinism.
Because:
In every market research we can define a group of people that will probaly buy
the actual item and another group that will probably NOT buy it. And there is
always a
30 jun 2011 kl. 21.07 Marsha wrote:
On Jun 28, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote:
Hello Marsha
Thanks for your humble answer.
28 jun 2011 kl. 15.41 Marsho wrote:
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:40 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote:
Hi Marsha
27 jun 2011 kl. 18.44 sMarsha wrote
passed on through the ages
of time. So, Not-John, what is it?
More below.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Jan-Anders Andersson
janander...@telia.com wrote:
Hi Mark
4 jul 2011 kl. 21.04 Mark wrote:
It is clear that there are many ways to define Quality, but no way to
describe
18 jul 2011 kl. 10.55 Marsha wrote:
n Jul 17, 2011, at 8:15 PM, david buchanan wrote:
The MOQ rejects the Cartesian self as a ridiculous fiction and replaces that
concept of the self with the MOQ's concept of the self as a complex ecology
of static patterns. The Cartesian self is the
and make out even in cyberspace. But just because the
number is unlimited doesn't mean that they don't exist. What is the real taste
of experiencing the difference?
Jan-Anders
On Jul 18, 2011, at 7:06 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote:
18 jul 2011 kl. 10.55 Marsha wrote:
n Jul 17, 2011
Hi Andre
Marsha is right in her opinion that a tool of steel like a monkey wrench is by
time a ever-changing set of molecules.
But as long as the nut is also still having its set of molecules and its
pattern are static and stable enough, then a skilled mechanic can use the
wrench to tight
Hi Marsha
Before you dive into the deep. Have you ever read this? It's an excerpt from a
letter written by RMP to Anthony McWatt, March 23, 1997:
...
The MOQ is in agreement with the Buddhist law of Dependent Origination and
regards this law as an excellent explanation of how Dynamic Quality
are ready to make the point of your thought experiment clear I
will consider it.
Marsha
On May 10, 2013, at 5:50 AM, Jan Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com
wrote:
Well Marsha
You admit that the clay changes from soft and malleable to firm and stable
AND still
, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Jan Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com
wrote:
Dear Marsha
It shouldn't hurt or be dangerous in any way to just answer my questions
with YES or NO.
Is the clay burned to make it firm? Y/N
Does that make it better and more useful? Y/N
J-A
Jan-Anders
How about this
http://www.flixxy.com/the-incredible-power-of-concentration-miyoko-shida.htm#.UZCXf3DEjcU
J A
13 maj 2013 x kl. 09.14 skrev MarshaV:
Greetings J-A,
On May 13, 2013, at 1:56 AM, Jan Anders Andersson wrote:
Dear Marsha
I think you are interested to know its point
On May 13, 2013, at 3:43 AM, Jan Anders Andersson wrote:
How about this
http://www.flixxy.com/the-incredible-power-of-concentration-miyoko-shida.htm#.UZCXf3DEjcU
J A
Greetings J-A,
On May 13, 2013, at 1:56 AM, Jan Anders Andersson wrote:
Dear Marsha
I think you
Dear Marsha
What do you like the writings of Robert M Pirsig?
J A
13 maj 2013 x kl. 11.05 skrev MarshaV:
J-A,
What she?
Marsha
On May 13, 2013, at 4:50 AM, Jan Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com
wrote:
So did you like the pattern she created?
J A
13
, was there? And now another pointless question?
Mu!
Marsha
On May 13, 2013, at 6:10 AM, Jan Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com
wrote:
Dear Marsha
What do you like the writings of Robert M Pirsig?
J A
13 maj 2013 x kl. 11.05 skrev MarshaV:
J-A,
What she
reification and a very superficial understanding.
Marsha
p.s. Get someone else to play the role of Alcibiades.
On May 13, 2013, at 6:37 AM, Jan Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com
wrote:
bc45852...@telia.com 34acaa2f-f372-4c02-906c-e083fabc5...@att.net
To: moq_disc
af0c594...@telia.com e0aca30b-5d81-46d5-808f-fcb27f0ad...@att.net
eab738ea-0ba0-487b-a5a5-4a733f6c5...@att.net
8eb1d3fa-2d7d-4e70-9379-38f6af65b...@att.net
31906781-1a70-4201-8aac-90658c96e...@att.net
ead9cac2-7f62-4e23-9af4-096c542bc...@att.net
To: moq_disc...@moqtalk.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail
So whenevef you hit something hard with your toe, like a physical pattern, it's
just hypothetical. Yes or No?
Truth might be painful.
All the best
JanAndrs
20 maj 2013 kl. 15:31 MarshaV wrote val...@att.net:
If again you are addressing static (relative) truths, than yes indeed, it is
6729a1f0be6da...@phx.gbl snt139-w45cb5d36f07a2fb12da09bda...@phx.gbl
snt139-w498f6f301b37e2235bec17da...@phx.gbl
56a2e6c7-06c7-48cb-a30f-38f8bfa69...@gmail.com
1369485807.86088.yahoomail...@web125105.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
0b1563cd-8928-440c-91d4-eea686f7b...@gmail.com
Hi all
In my view, MOQ IS at the 5th level, because metaphysics is based above, or
outside the intellectual level.
Jan-Anders
Adrie said:
Pirsig played with the idea that we are in need of a fift level, the quantum
level probably, but was doubting it at the same time. He is a writer,
Dear women and gentlemen
The original question seemed to me as a kind of IQ quiz, you know, like the
series of 4 symbols that evolve in some weird pattern and there is an empty
space for the fifth that should be filled in. I like that kind of challenges
but I don't cry if I can't do it right.
of the
lower
forms of quality, excellence in mind body and environment.
That not only is the test of truth its use in the flow of experience but also
its overall
excellence and worth to the human species as a whole.
-Ron
..
Jan Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com wrote:
Dear
Hi all
Has anybody reflected over this?
An overview over Bozeman looks like an indian chief with a pipe in his mouth.
see where you are going.
You can only see now, now, now...
Marsha
On May 29, 2013, at 6:11 AM, X xa...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Jan
We can not see where we are going only where we have been..
Ron
Jan Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com wrote:
Hi Ron
Literally
, Jan Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com
wrote:
That is just a stupid thing to say Marsha.
Most of us here know what you have said and also what standpoint you're
going to take tomorrow.
Concepts about time, the past and the future are high quality patterns.
Take it easy my dear
Dear Marsha
Please just meditate over one single word you write or read.
Jan,
Though I am stupid, seeing is still an experience of now, now, now...
Marsha
On May 29, 2013, at 8:43 AM, Jan Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com
wrote:
That is just a stupid thing to say
404530.19410.yahoomail...@web162101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
1366255586.20177.yahoomail...@web162104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
1366330824.17153.yahoomail...@web162102.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
1366331013.17129.yahoomail...@web162106.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
1367946845.39374.yahoomail...@web162104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Dear Marsha
Every word you are using, every single sound and concept in your contributions,
are static intellectual patterns.
Hope you like it.
Jan-Anders
4 jun 2013 kl. 19:30 skrev MarshaV val...@att.net:
Greetings,
So what are these intellectual patterns? Are they based on
Dear Marsha
The same attention would be applied while we are composing contributions to MD.
JanAnders
Hi Joe,
I think this is description of what RMP means by caring, when one isn't
dominated by feelings of separateness from what he's working on:
Chanoyu:
Most Westerners
ceremony which was a topic being
considered in an earlier post.
Thanks.
Marsha
On Jul 9, 2013, at 12:29 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com
wrote:
Dear Marsha
The same attention would be applied while we are composing contributions to
MD.
JanAnders
Kill Ugly Radio
Frank Zappa
Zap
Robert Crumb
Too much or too little is wasted
JanAnders
dmb,
On Jul 23, 2013, at 2:24 PM, david buchanan wrote:
Marsha said:
It might be difficult for those who have not practiced mindful-awareness to
imagine functioning without any
Hi Dmb and All
Dan said:
...Motorcycle maintenance is an excellent analogy for this ever-evolving
intellectual journey we all are (hopefully) on. Faulty logic,
contradiction, and lack of intellectual coherence in this philosophy forum is
the same as trying to tune a motorcycle
Dear Marsha
This is a wonderful misreading you are performing. Because we need the
intellectual patterns to exchange our thoughts here at MD.
In the case of performing rhetoric betterness though, we have to got a sense
for the un-intellectual. Getting good friends to play around with is an
Dear Marsha
I don't think this has anything to do with RMP's writings and the Metaphysics
of Quality.
JanAnders
12 aug 2013 x kl. 17.33 skrev MarshaV:
I think the video speaks a high quality innovation:
Japanese Ingenuity -- Save your plastic
This is one of the most amazing
Hi all
Here is a film you can watch on the net for one month about Joe Sarno who
devoted his life to Quality films before making profit, about human desire for
each other.
At the end of the movie there is an excellent scene where Peggy proudly shows
evidence for celebrity, it's more worth
,
I've not watched the film (yet) - so no opinion - but who says
celebrity is higher quality than money ?
I think you'll find Pirsig shunned celebrity and bought a big
ocean-going yacht with his royalties ;-)
Ian
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Jan Anders Andersson
janander...@telia.com
Hi all
dmb says:
I think it's quite clear that there are all kinds of ways to describe
intellectual quality WITHOUT getting it mixed up with SOM. Even after
rejecting SOM for an expanded and improved form of rationality, an artful
rationality, Pirsig still lists the basic criteria by
Hi all
Just a reminder:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151229584259260set=vb.691124259type=3permPage=1
J A
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
Dear Marsha
I find the contributions from Andre, Ron and Dmb dynamic and interesting. Your
static stubborness is fascinating. Just follow your heart (Castaneda), your
experience and intellectual sense for feelings. Whatever makes you happy would
be enough I think.
J A
28 aug 2013 kl. 10:56
Hi All
Marsha seems to be mostly interested in the pure experience beyound static
patterns. Others are saying that experience with turning back 180 degrees back
to static and dynamic patterns are necessary to understand Quality. I agree
with them.
Aioli is a dynamic compound made of dynamic,
Me too
All the best, Mr. Pirsig.
Jan-Anders
6 sep 2013 x kl. 09.04 skrev MarshaV:
Dear Mr. Pirsig,
It always a pleasure to be able to wish you a Happy Birthday and to express
my gratitude to you for writing Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance and
LILA. I know it has become a
Great post David
Quality experience is not a mystic God, either it weighs over to a question
about amount (too much or too little), form (right tool for your bike) or a
relational problem (hot stove). That's why it is impossible to define Quality,
reality is the on-going defining process and
Howdy DM
Just put it like this, two very static word patterns, that doesn't change...
WHAT, is about static quality patterns
HOW, is about dynamic quality patterns.
Hope you see the difference
Jan-Anders
20 sep 2013 x kl. 15.50 ARLO JAMES BENSINGER JR:
[DM]
Sure the SQ we identify is
Greetings,
I understand it to be the Buddhist (imho) view that the self-object
(dualistic) point-of-view is perpetuated in two ways. One is as acquired
through learning, from family, friends and teachers, an informal system of
philosophy or psychology - culture - that teaches that
Don't be a fool DM. Obviously you're using an understanding of the word
experience that is different from what RMP is suggesting in Lila.
Jan-Anders
3 okt 2013 kl. 03:14 skrev David Morey david...@blueyonder.co.uk:
DMB
Concepts can agree to the pre-conceptual patterns/qualities we find
Dear Marsha
3 okt 2013 kl. 10:10 skrev MarshaV val...@att.net:
dmb,
So what is changing? Multiple fluxes? Does flux(x) change into flux(y)?
How many fluxes must there be? There must be a time aspect involved with
this explanation of fluxes: a flux before and a flux after the
The only way to know, Marsha, is to get experience-d, a d witch means static
patterned. This thread would be impossible to read without common static
letters, words and concepts.
An opinion, however, can be changed easily.
JanAnders
4 okt 2013 kl. 11:46 skrev Andre Broersen
Hi DM
If you can't follow Dmb's advice I'll suggest that you take a look at my book
Money and the Art of Losing Control where the the picture of preconceptual
experiences comes in Color!
Jan-Anders
5 okt 2013 kl. 00:20 skrev david buchanan dmbucha...@hotmail.com:
David Morey said to
Hi All
I think the only preconceptual pattern before experience there are, must be
based on an individual choice of the ultimate motivator for the creation and
evolution. A basic meme, statistical chance, the selfish gene, God, Good or
something else. It can also be based on the level of
Hi David
It may help if you use this metaphor.
Think about Quality as a balancing point, anything attracted to it has a
different direction, depending on where it is located. A human for example, is
standing on the ground on this planet. What's up and what's down is different
to anyone on
Very funny example DM! Because what you should really consider is, just like in
the color blind test, you're just acting experince blindly. It is you that
act as you call Dmb, you apparently doesn't understand what dmb is writing. You
maybe read dmb's words but doesn't understand RMP's concept
is not a
preconceptual pattern, it comes from SQ as time, saved time.
Jan-Anders
Jan-Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com wrote:
Very funny example DM! Because what you should really consider is, just like
in the color blind test, you're just acting experince blindly. It is you
that act as you call Dmb
Hi Andre and DM
The only inherent property of DQ is the balance between amount, form and
expression. Unbalance, however, is the trigger, the motivator which starts next
step in any process. That is why just any stupid contribution is allowed in a
discussion. To find a new balance point,
Dear Marsha
Evolution, even the four-folded, shows that anything that saves time, i e more
life in less days, is better and more Right way.
One of my readers told me yesterday that she's reading my book Money And the
Art... for the fourth time now. Rhetoric is always dependant the number of
In the 17th century Thomas Hobbes wrote:
“For such is the nature of (wo)men, that howsoever they may acknowledge many
others to be more witty, or more eloquent, or more learned; Yet they will
hardly believe there be many so wise as themselves; For they see their own wit
at hand, and other
DQ shows up its funny face :-)
Don't worry Ron, its just another static quality.
Jan-Anders
22 nov 2013 x kl. 01.38 skrev Ron Kulp:
It was bad enough Lego got its mitts
On Star Wars ... Now Bob?
How bout a shock therapy play set?
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 21, 2013, at 7:34 PM,
Dear Marsha
The first thing one should ask is: Are you serious?
Jan-Anders
28 nov 2013 kl. 11:50 skrev MarshaV val...@att.net:
From a MoQ value perspective, what do you think is the task of the
philosopher? King or poet, or something else entirely? What is the task of
the
Sure, but are you serious?
28 nov 2013 kl. 12:42 skrev MarshaV val...@att.net:
J-A,
Certainly they would not seem serious questions if you already know it all.
Marsha
On Nov 28, 2013, at 6:14 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com
wrote:
Dear Marsha
The first
Yes Ron
And a living dialogue is one that properly serves the social needs of both
sides. Or it will be a scream in the desert.
J-A
10 dec 2013 kl. 04:29 skrev X Acto xa...@rocketmail.com:
A living philosophy is one that properly serves a psychological need. Not,
however, as a
7 jan 2014 kl. 21:05 skrev Joseph Maurer jh...@comcast.net:
Hi Andre and All,
DQ/SQ, indefinable/definable! A structure which supports indefinable
reality must include aspects of reality which are indefinable like free-will
which remains outside of definition through freedom. If I
Hi Joe
I think your confusion starts with indefinable as indefinable, too, is a
definition or as we say, a static pattern.
Your pattern DQ/SQ, is more interesting as it can be used as a model, an
intellectual pattern, that describes the motivational force following DQ.
As an example: If the
They ask for access to your entire collection of mail addresses, right?
J A
15 jan 2014 kl. 00:15 skrev John Carl ridgecoy...@gmail.com:
wtf?
I just put all linkedin messages in my spam box and I guess this is my
punishment from that mafia-run organization.
yoikes.
On Tue, Jan
Right David
I think much depends on not seeing the difference between spreading the light
of wisdom and lighting free and independent candles.
Jan-Anders
19 jan 2014 kl. 02:37 skrev david dmbucha...@hotmail.com:
This is a tangential issue and nobody asked BUT please notice what Pirsig
Hi Ian
I think that the AI revolution, that began with the introduction of automatic
machines in our industry in the 19th century, will meet several types of
conflicts with us humans. Not only on the different levels from Pirsig's Lila
but also by the well to the number of 42 by Douglas Adams.
25 jan 2014 kl. 10:21 skrev Jan-Anders Andersson janander...@telia.com:
Hi Ian
I think that the AI revolution, that began with the introduction of automatic
machines in our industry in the 19th century, will meet several types of
conflicts with us humans. Not only on the different
Hi John
28 jan 2014 kl. 19:02 skrev John Carl ridgecoy...@gmail.com:
Dan,
John prev:
But it's interesting to consider that the over all plan for the human,
doesn't come from on top It comes from it's DNA and like wise the
city's
overall plans comes from the dreams and ideas of
Hi Andre
Sorry about your inconvenience but MALC is my 400 pages comment to ZAMM and
Lila. I just happen to mention the mystic behind the number 42 in it, too. But
my solution to that is to add Quality to it which makes it 43. :-)
Which is what I think RMP would suggest. i e How can Quality be
By inspiration from Andre I'll suggest that we start a discussion about how to
define the difference between level one, the inorganic and level two, the
organic. I couldn't find any consistent thread in the Archives.
Jan-Anders
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
We all her know that it is a difference, Adam and the clay is way of a romantic
expression of the difference but how should a classical person describe it?
A precise definition of the difference might be useful when we are talking to a
complete novice for example.
Inorganic patterns have a
Nice work Andre. Selfperpetuating sounds as an elementary difference.
Where does these annotations comw from?
30 jan 2014 kl. 18:16 skrev Andre andrebroer...@gmail.com:
Jan-Anders:
By inspiration from Andre I'll suggest that we start a discussion about how
to define the difference
Well Ian, Lila is an inquiry about morals. Please notice the last letter s.
That means that RMP was pointing at more than one moral level.
So what are the moral like at level 1 and at level 2?
Just curious but still serious
Jan-Anders
31 jan 2014 kl. 14:23 skrev Ian Glendinning
, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Jan-Anders Andersson
janander...@telia.com wrote:
Well Ian, Lila is an inquiry about morals. Please notice the last letter s.
That means that RMP was pointing at more than one moral level.
So what are the moral like at level 1 and at level 2?
Just curious but still serious
Andre
1 feb 2014 kl. 08:45 skrev Andre andrebroer...@gmail.com:
J-A:
How can we describe the difference between moral 1, the inorganic, and moral
2 the organic?
Andre:
My guess is that the inorganic level is 'informed' by the morals of the laws
of (quantum)physics,
My guess is
404530.19410.yahoomail...@web162101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
1366255586.20177.yahoomail...@web162104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
1366330824.17153.yahoomail...@web162102.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
1366331013.17129.yahoomail...@web162106.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
1367946845.39374.yahoomail...@web162104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Hi John
You're lucky. I had some promo codes left so here are your ticket to a free
copy on the itunes ibookstore:
R4E47KMYYA76
Happy reading!
Jan-Anders
30 jan 2014 x kl. 19.16 skrev John Carl:
Jan-Anders,
You said in response to my discussion with Dan:
That was the reason for me
Hi Gents, (any Ladies?)
In our work to refine the metaphysics of Quality I think we must use the
element of time here. Actually, we are talking about step two, as step one
should be the first step from where there where no Organic patterns at all,
before the first change, into the moment after
Good morning all
I think it's time to summarize the former thread called step one.
I was asking for the exact definition of the delimiter between the inorganic
level and the organic level. Dan and David put in some interesting read wether
DNA was the most important or if a speculative and
Dan
22 feb 2014 kl. 05:45 skrev Dan Glover daneglo...@gmail.com:
Jan and John,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:26 PM, John Carl ridgecoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Jan Anders Andersson
janander...@telia.com wrote:
Good morning all
I think it's time to summarize
Amen
(in the name of Reason)
Jan-Anders
5 mar 2014 kl. 00:31 skrev david dmbucha...@hotmail.com:
John McConnell said to Ant McWatt, March 4th 2014 (off-line):
There’s no point igniting a God-bomb in that bunch of theophobes on MD.
Here at least you and I understand each other.
Hi there
Before the Big Bang or should we say at the oldest point of change number one,
there was absolute nothing, no world or time. After change number one there is
a piece of world which is all there is. This world has age, entropy and volume
and measure, so My guess is that some of the
exactly.
Jan-Anders, God's proxy for tonight.
3 apr 2014 x kl. 21.05 skrev John Carl:
Hi J-A,
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Jan-Anders Andersson
janander...@telia.comwrote:
Hi there
Before the Big Bang or should we say at the oldest point of change number
one, there was absolute
Good morning fellows
Here are an author that have received The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic
Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, (no it is NOT the Nobel Prize in Economy
because that doesn't exist): David Kahneman, who have written a book called
Thinking, Fast and Slow
in the media is
increasingly wrong, but his work itself is very good. Lots of good
parallels between 1 2 and MoQism, SOMism takes on intellect,
backed-up with scientific evidence.
Ian
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Jan Anders Andersson
janander...@telia.com wrote:
Good morning fellows
15, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Jan Anders Andersson
janander...@telia.com wrote:
Yes Ian
But I didn't find anything about DANIEL Kahneman here on MD.
Are you prepared for system 3?
Jan-Anders
15 maj 2014 x kl. 10.49 skrev Ian Glendinning:
Written about Kahneman several times.
http
. 11.23 skrev Ian Glendinning:
Kahneman
(4th post of the day)
Ian
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Jan Anders Andersson
janander...@telia.com wrote:
ail.com
To: moq_disc...@moqtalk.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
What words are you searching? I tried system 1 and found System
Great idea. Looking forward for that post Ron
Jan-Anders
23 maj 2014 kl. 19:44 skrev Ron Kulp xa...@rocketmail.com:
I would like to preface this thread by making it known that I am taking up
this project as the dialectical devils advocate that devil being John Carl.
In this thread I
Hi Ron, and this is also for John
In a MOQ view, the intellectual level carries concepts that are dependent of
the social level to be expressed but using the social level for its own
purposes. Concepts are not dependant on individuals, names and words, formulas
and just any intellectual
1 - 100 of 405 matches
Mail list logo
