[MORPHMET] Re: PREPRINT: between-group principal components analysis (bgPCA)

2019-05-16 Thread morphmet_moderator
This and related threads have now been locked. Non-morphometric issues should be taken up elsewhere. Non-morphometric posts/replies are subject to deletion from the web site. Violators are subject to being put back on the "moderation" list. -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http:/

[MORPHMET] Re: PREPRINT: between-group principal components analysis (bgPCA)

2019-05-16 Thread MORPHMET
Dear MorphMetters, Yesterday David Polly reminded us of the existence of a 3.5-page draft fragment emailed by Andrea Cardini on September 5, 2018 and headed as by "Cardini, O'Higgins, Polly, Rohlf, Bookstein." So, yes, David Polly was indeed present at the creation. It begins with paragraphs of

[MORPHMET] Test post - ignore

2019-05-16 Thread morphmet_moderator
Have locked myself out of posting to the list. Trying to test. Ignore this message. -ds -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MORPHMET" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

RE: [MORPHMET] thanks for support

2019-05-16 Thread Dominique Adriaens
Hi Andrea, I can only applaud your courage to make such a breach on scientific ethics clear to the scientific community, it should be done more. In a time where scientific integrity is put higher and higher on the agenda (where it belongs), I find it striking that such practices as you unfortun

[MORPHMET] thanks for support

2019-05-16 Thread andrea cardini
Dear morphometricians, I would like to thank all those who openly and privately expressed their support on the issue of the BG-PCA papers, which I, regretfully, had to make public. I have to stress that I am no better than anyone else and certainly worse than very many. I make many mistakes (