Dear Mr. Soda,

Thank you for replying. Your statement " setting one group’s mean shape to 
be the starting shape and the other group’s to the target; this will lead 
to the most direct comparison. " pretty much describes what I have in mind 
to do. Which software could I use to do this? since I believe MorphoJ will 
not do it.



El miércoles, 31 de octubre de 2018, 13:51:07 (UTC-6), K. James Soda 
escribió:
>
> Dear Mr. Ardón,
>
> Good question. Whenever we make shape comparisons in GM, be that via 
> displacement vector or deformation grid (which is what you’re doing), we 
> can typically only compare two shapes at a time. One shape is called the 
> reference (or starting shape, in this case). This is the shape for which 
> the grid would look “normal”; straight, equally spaced grid lines. The 
> second is the target, where the grid is deformed to take this second 
> configuration. If you want to compare two geographic groups, I would 
> suggest setting one group’s mean shape to be the starting shape and the 
> other group’s to the target; this will lead to the most direct comparison. 
> I am not certain how easy this is to do in MorphoJ, though.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> James
>
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Diego Ardón <diegoar...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> Hello, my name is Diego and I'm currently undertaking a Master's program 
> in Mexico. One of my thesis project involves a geometric morphometrics 
> study on the shape of a freshwater fish which distributes across Central 
> America. I'm currently having trouble with a concept that will probably be 
> very simple to most of you, but which I haven't found a way to get my head 
> around. 
>
> I'm running a CVA on MorphoJ, dividing my dataset into two geographically 
> distinct groups. I run the test and change the type of graph to a "Warped 
> Outline Drawing". So now the graph is showing a "starting shape" which I 
> interpret as it being the average of all my landmark data (both 
> geographical groupings), however I'm not sure on how to interpret the 
> "target shape". I was expecting to have two "target shapes", one for each 
> of the geographical groupings. Could someone please help point out my 
> misunderstanding and offer me a way on how to interpret the "target shape"? 
>
> Thank you, I'll be very thankful
>
> Diego Ardón
>
> -- 
> MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MORPHMET" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to morphmet+u...@morphometrics.org <javascript:>.
>
>

-- 
MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MORPHMET" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org.

Reply via email to