Avi,
I think these details are probably not of general interest, but we can
continue separately.
Don
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Avi Koplovich
wrote:
> Hi Don,
> This surely solves my problem with considering landmark 40 as a fixed one
> (it's not!). So I
Avi,
The reason landmark 40 is not a landmark is related to you definition of it
as a point between two others. If it were simply the midpoint on a line
connecting two other points, it would not represent any data that was not
captured by the coordinates of the points used in the definition (it
Anderson,
I want to add another point the others have not yet mentioned.
One very simple explanation could be that you are seeing parallax effects,
although it is hard to be sure without knowing which group represents which
magnification or where the points are on the skull. At a minimum, the