Re: [MORPHMET] Doubt Scaling photos

2018-01-04 Thread Anderson Feijo
o answer this. > > > > M > > > > > > *From:* Anderson Feijo [mailto:andefe...@gmail.com <andefe...@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* Monday, January 1, 2018 11:02 PM > *To:* Murat Maga <m...@uw.edu> <m...@uw.edu> > *Cc:* MORPHMET <morphmet@morphometrics.org

Re: [MORPHMET] Doubt Scaling photos

2018-01-04 Thread Carmelo Fruciano
Feijo [mailto:andefe...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, January 1, 2018 11:02 PM *To:* Murat Maga <m...@uw.edu> *Cc:* MORPHMET <morphmet@morphometrics.org> *Subject:* Re: [MORPHMET] Doubt Scaling photos Dear Murat, Thank you very much for your email and time for explore my dataset. To perfo

Re: [MORPHMET] Doubt Scaling photos

2018-01-01 Thread Anderson Feijo
Dear Murat, Thank you very much for your email and time for explore my dataset. To perform this simple experiment, given the aim was to explore the magnification issue, I chose only three landmarks (as you could see in the tps file) easily to replicate. The reason I am trying to combine two

RE: [MORPHMET] Doubt Scaling photos

2017-12-29 Thread Murat Maga
Dear Anderson, It has nothing to do with the scale of your data (or least not directly). As you can see, you actually performed those two digitization attempts differently. It is maybe 1-2 pixels off, but in a very consistent way (greens are from one scale, red is the other scale, and cross is