Re: [MORPHMET] Doubt about scalling photos

2018-01-12 Thread Donald Swiderski
Anderson, I want to add another point the others have not yet mentioned. One very simple explanation could be that you are seeing parallax effects, although it is hard to be sure without knowing which group represents which magnification or where the points are on the skull. At a minimum, the

Re: [MORPHMET] Doubt about scalling photos

2018-01-11 Thread Anderson Feijo
Dear Dean and Sonja, Thank you for your suggestions. I am exploring all these potential bias before starting my study. I have learned a lot through all comments and literature suggestions. I deeply appreciated your help. Best, Anderson On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Adams, Dean [EEOBS]

RE: [MORPHMET] Doubt about scalling photos

2018-01-08 Thread Adams, Dean [EEOBS]
Anderson, I don’t think you appreciated the importance of the Murat’s comments on your earlier post on this same topic. In theory, there is no problem combining objects digitized at different magnifications, or even digitized by different researchers. However, before doing so one must

Re: [MORPHMET] Doubt about scalling photos

2018-01-08 Thread Sonja Windhager
Dear Anderson Feijo, I assume that the difference is not a matter of scaling (that could be addressed with the Procrustes superimposition), but one of optical distortions caused by the lens. This paper exemplifies this for different lenses: