Dear All,
Lea's message has generated a very interesting discussion, which as
usual has been very instructive for me.
My points were really basic ones. I am not worried about semilandmarks
(although when I read something like "... subjects were analyzed to
collect between 2700 and 10 400
inal Message-
From: Murat Maga [mailto:m...@uw.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 12:33 PM
To: Mike Collyer <mlcoll...@gmail.com>; Lea Wolter <leawolter...@gmail.com>
Cc: MORPHMET <morphmet@morphometrics.org>
Subject: RE: [MORPHMET] number of landmarks and sample size
I want to chim
ter...@gmail.com>
Cc: MORPHMET <morphmet@morphometrics.org>
Subject: Re: [MORPHMET] number of landmarks and sample size
Dear Lea,
I see others have responded to your inquiry, already. I thought I would add an
additional perspective.
Your question about statistical significance requires asking
Dear Lea,
I see others have responded to your inquiry, already. I thought I would add an
additional perspective.
Your question about statistical significance requires asking a follow-up
question. What statistical methods would you intend to use to evaluate
“significance”? If you are
