Pablo — I use photogrammetry to create models from skulls and I’d be happy to share my workflow if you want to experiment with it. It works really well in most cases. I’ve been curious about about the Spider scanner, so would love to hear about your experiences with that. Feel free to drop me a line at wrob...@msu.edu <mailto:wrob...@msu.edu>.
Gabriel > On May 7, 2019, at 5:40 PM, Pablo Fisichella <fisichellapa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Dear Ariadne > > Thank you so much for your kind response and excuse my delayed reply. I´m > using an Artec Space Spide scanner. I´m doing some tests following several of > the guidelines here suggested. For lithic tools some reflecting surfaces > typical of some raw materials like chert produce some errors but is just a > matter of test. Thanks again for your advice. > > All best, > > Pablo > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > Libre de virus. www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > <x-msg://11/#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > El sáb., 27 abr. 2019 a las 11:56, Ariadne Schulz (<ariadne.sch...@gmail.com > <mailto:ariadne.sch...@gmail.com>>) escribió: > I'm coming at this a bit late so I apologize if I've repeated anyone's point. > For your purposes photogrammetry is probably your best option particularly > for the lithics. Laser scanning works on bones and I used a NextEngine > scanner for human proximal long bones, but I think someone has already > mentioned that the laser doesn't capture the orbitals well and you might have > difficulty with tooth enamel. The photogrammetry software requires a decently > hefty laptop, but it's affordable and you'd be working with normal light > rather than lasers. I don't know that this clears up your concerns about > fusing scans though. If you are concerned you could do some error testing on > that comparing landmarks obtained on the scans to landmarks obtained > normally. I found the laser scans to be pretty decent, but I unfortunately > cannot speak to photogrammetry as I've never personally tried it. > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 3:29 PM Pablo Fisichella <fisichellapa...@gmail.com > <mailto:fisichellapa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Dear All > > I´m trying to obtain surface scans from human skulls and lithic artifacts > (projectile points). I wonder how can I get the most complete possible scans, > I mean usually is not possibly to obtain a complete scan at once. I know that > several post-scan processing software have functions to fuse and/or align the > different surfaces obtained and then create one surface but perhaps several > of you have some tips to obtain the most complete possible surface scans. > > Any suggestion and advice is more than welcome > > All best, > > Pablo > > > -- > MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org > <http://www.morphometrics.org/> > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MORPHMET" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org > <mailto:morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org>. > > -- > MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org > <http://www.morphometrics.org/> > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MORPHMET" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org > <mailto:morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org>. -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MORPHMET" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org.
