Re: [Moses-support] GHKM translation is slow

My decoding options are the default, I tried using cube-pruning-limit, & stack size but still not good enough On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Ayah ElMaghraby wrote: > Hello > > I am trying to created a SMT using ghkm extraction but it is very slow > during translation

[Moses-support] Moses server with --output-search-graph

When running mosesserver with --output-search-graph, I don't get a search graph file created. Is this the expected behavior? Or is something else going on? Thanks, Lane ___ Moses-support mailing list Moses-support@mit.edu

Re: [Moses-support] language models options

Hello Vincent, According to some experiences, your option number 3 is the best one. Cheers, Christophe De : moses-support-boun...@mit.edu [mailto:moses-support-boun...@mit.edu] De la part de Vincent Nguyen Envoyé : mercredi 6 avril 2016 17:11 À : Philipp Koehn Cc :

Re: [Moses-support] language models options

Sorry Philipp, I did not ask my question properly. I was not talking about the phrase table. I was talking about the language model options that we have. when I said corpus I was referring to the data for the LM itself. and in terms of "performance" I was more talking about the impact on

Re: [Moses-support] language models options

Hi, the number of phrase tables should not matter much, but the number of language models has a significant impact on speed. There are no general hard numbers on this, since it depends on a lot of other settings, but adding a second language model will slow down decoder around 30-50%. The size

[Moses-support] language models options

Hi, What are (in terms of performance) the difference between the 3 following solutions : 2 corpus, 2 LM, 2 weights calculated at tuning time 2 corpus merged into one, 1 LM 2 corpus, 2 LM interpolated into 1 LM with tuning Will the results be different in the end ? thanks.

Re: [Moses-support] Filtering Binarized LM

Probing format models can't be filtered because they only retain hashes of ngrams. Trie format models can be filtered and dumped, but only with the very hacky and undocumented dump_trie program in the bounded-noquant branch. Hasn't been a priority to make it release quality; volunteers? Kenneth

Re: [Moses-support] compile.sh with --static

Dear Matthias and Kenneth, Thank you for the note on the --static options! Regards, Liling ___ Moses-support mailing list Moses-support@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

[Moses-support] Filtering Binarized LM

Dear Moses devs/users, The filter tool in KenLM is able to filter a LM based on a dev set ( https://kheafield.com/code/kenlm/filter/) but it only allows raw|arpa file. Is there another tool that filters binarized LMs? Given a binarized LM, is there a way to "debinarize" the LM? Thanks in