Dear Phi and Moses community,
@Phi, thanks for confirming the note on the 2nd row of BLEU up to the 4th
order being our "normally-regarded" BLEU.
>From looking through some sets, it seems like the cumulative BLEU is some
how linearly declining while the individual BLEU is decaying at some
exponen
It compiles well. Thanks.
2016年10月26日 下午10:54，"Hieu Hoang" 寫道：
> fixed.
>
> https://github.com/moses-smt/mosesdecoder/commit/80ae436db17
> 7bfadc2db9e1d078f392acfde844c
>
> it compiles but I didn't test whether it runs ok on this new debian.
> Please let me know if you encounter problems
>
> On 2
Hi - I trained a phrase based system from a low resource language to
english, and got *13.6633* as the BLEU score. However, when I tested on the
same dev set and computed BLEU against the English corpus in the dev set, I
only got *3.69*. Then I did a manual grid search over the parameter space
in m
Hi,
I think you are right - the first set of numbers are the n-gram precisions
for each order of n-gram.
The second set are numbers that you get if you take the geometric mean of
the n-gram precisions.
Hence, the number under 4-gram is the BLEU score.
The BLEU score is traditionally computed for
Hi All,
I’m trying to do syntax-based constrained decoding on the same data from which
I extracted my rules, and I’m getting very low coverage (~12%). I’m using GHKM
rule extraction which in theory should be able to reconstruct the target
translation even only with minimal rules.
Judging from
fixed.
https://github.com/moses-smt/mosesdecoder/commit/80ae436db177bfadc2db9e1d078f392acfde844c
it compiles but I didn't test whether it runs ok on this new debian.
Please let me know if you encounter problems
On 26/10/2016 12:26, Dingyuan Wang wrote:
> Get a stable one, edit /etc/apt/sources.
Get a stable one, edit /etc/apt/sources.list to change all 'jessie' to
'testing', then apt update && apt dist-upgrade.
2016-10-26 19:09, Hieu Hoang:
> i'm not familiar with Debian. How do you install the 'testing'
> configuration? The default gcc on there seems to be 4.9.2
>
>
> On 26/10/2016 10
i'm not familiar with Debian. How do you install the 'testing'
configuration? The default gcc on there seems to be 4.9.2
On 26/10/2016 10:22, Dingyuan Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Debian "testing" latest, gcc 6.2.0
>
> I do want to test out the moses2.
>
> 2016-10-26 17:17, Hieu Hoang:
>> hiya
>>
>> ca
thanks. I'll test it with this configuration and will see if i can fix it
On 26/10/2016 10:22, Dingyuan Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Debian "testing" latest, gcc 6.2.0
>
> I do want to test out the moses2.
>
> 2016-10-26 17:17, Hieu Hoang:
>> hiya
>>
>> can you tell me which debian version and gcc versi
Hi,
Debian "testing" latest, gcc 6.2.0
I do want to test out the moses2.
2016-10-26 17:17, Hieu Hoang:
> hiya
>
> can you tell me which debian version and gcc version you are using.
>
> The compile error comes from Moses2. You can disable compilation of
> Moses2 by adding this argument to the
hiya
can you tell me which debian version and gcc version you are using.
The compile error comes from Moses2. You can disable compilation of
Moses2 by adding this argument to the bjam command:
bjam --no-xmlrpc-c
On 26/10/2016 10:10, Dingyuan Wang wrote:
Dear All,
I recently pulled
Dear All,
I recently pulled the git repo and got a build error with moses2 on a
Debian testing machine.
Build command is
./bjam --with-cmph=/usr/local -j6 -a
--
Dingyuan Wang
build.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
___
Moses-support mailing li
12 matches
Mail list logo
