Re: [Moses-support] moses server options different for moses vs. moses2

2016-11-03 Thread Hieu Hoang
Fair point. It silently ignored unimplemented functionally because moses2 originally implemented only a small subset. But that subset is getting larger so hopefully there won't be too many functionality that will cause a throw. I'll go with your suggestion Sent while bumping into things On 3 No

Re: [Moses-support] moses server options different for moses vs. moses2

2016-11-03 Thread Tom Hoar
Hieu, I'm not sure if it's a good thing for Moses2 to silently ignore unimplemented params. Wouldn't it avoid a lot of heartache to throw an error telling which param is not implemented? On 11/3/2016 2:32 AM, moses-support-requ...@mit.edu wrote: Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:32:04 -0500 From: Hieu

Re: [Moses-support] Ensemble of Neural Machine Translation systems

2016-11-03 Thread Rico Sennrich
Hello Nat, for NMT ensembles, you just average the probability distribution of different models at each time step before selecting the next hypothesis (or hypotheses in beam search). If you're familiar with Moses, this is similar to what happens when we combine different feature functions in

[Moses-support] EMS: filter-model-given-input.pl and threads

2016-11-03 Thread Tomasz Gawryl
Hi All, I'm trying to create compact phrase table during BilingualLM training. It works fine but there is one moment when process slows down. I set up 18 threads for TRAINING:binarize-config step : ttable-binarizer = "$moses-bin-dir/processPhraseTableMin -threads 18" But one of scri