Re: [Moses-support] language models options

2016-04-06 Thread Christophe Servan
gt; Cc : moses-support <moses-support@mit.edu> Objet : Re: [Moses-support] language models options Sorry Philipp, I did not ask my question properly. I was not talking about the phrase table. I was talking about the language model options that we have. when I said corpus I was referring

Re: [Moses-support] language models options

2016-04-06 Thread Vincent Nguyen
Sorry Philipp, I did not ask my question properly. I was not talking about the phrase table. I was talking about the language model options that we have. when I said corpus I was referring to the data for the LM itself. and in terms of "performance" I was more talking about the impact on

Re: [Moses-support] language models options

2016-04-06 Thread Philipp Koehn
Hi, the number of phrase tables should not matter much, but the number of language models has a significant impact on speed. There are no general hard numbers on this, since it depends on a lot of other settings, but adding a second language model will slow down decoder around 30-50%. The size

[Moses-support] language models options

2016-04-06 Thread Vincent Nguyen
Hi, What are (in terms of performance) the difference between the 3 following solutions : 2 corpus, 2 LM, 2 weights calculated at tuning time 2 corpus merged into one, 1 LM 2 corpus, 2 LM interpolated into 1 LM with tuning Will the results be different in the end ? thanks.