I just want to clarify: nobody has objected. We used to link with
skalibs on Debian (and included a convenience copy for
MacPorts/Homebrew and other platforms where skalibs aren't packaged),
but ran into trouble when we added our binary hardening flags.
The current status quo (with pselect()) is n
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
wrote:
> ... but please pull from git://git.wxcvbn.org/mosh.git - branch
> openbsd-build-fixes - as I don't have a github account.
Merged and pushed to master. Thank you!
-Keith
___
mosh-devel
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:54:52PM -0400, Quentin Smith wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:41:19PM -0400, Alex Chernyakhovsky wrote:
> >>I wonder if it's possible for mosh to switch back to the old self-pipe
> >>code, now that ftpmaster has approved of mosh, and "sneak it in".
> >
> >Don't f
Note that pselect on OS X is implemented in userspace, and has the exact
race that we're trying to avoid here.
--QUentin
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Keith Winstein wrote:
> I liked our original solution of using signalfd(), and I like our current
> solution of using pselect() even more, since it's cr
I liked our original solution of using signalfd(), and I like our current
solution of using pselect() even more, since it's cross-platform to
everywhere except OpenBSD. Even Solaris and AIX and Cygwin have pselect()!
If we have to add a workaround for OpenBSD (as Jeremie has helpfully
contribut
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:41:19PM -0400, Alex Chernyakhovsky wrote:
>> I wonder if it's possible for mosh to switch back to the old self-pipe
>> code, now that ftpmaster has approved of mosh, and "sneak it in".
>
> Don't forget that there are Deb
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:41:19PM -0400, Alex Chernyakhovsky wrote:
> I wonder if it's possible for mosh to switch back to the old self-pipe
> code, now that ftpmaster has approved of mosh, and "sneak it in".
Don't forget that there are Debian folks (like me :-) are reading this
list, too. ;
I wonder if it's possible for mosh to switch back to the old self-pipe
code, now that ftpmaster has approved of mosh, and "sneak it in".
-Alex
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Quentin Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Keegan: Can you weigh in here on whet
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Keegan: Can you weigh in here on whether we depend on pselect()'s
atomicity and whether this usage here is ok in practice?
If the code in the client or the server had called select with an
infinite timeout, then I would have worried a bit mo
I would propose we add a hotkey or the like to trigger a new lookup.
We don't want to continuously to a lookup.
-r
On (04/16/13 11:07), Ken T Takusagawa wrote:
>This is a hypothetical scenario, but does mosh work if the
>server changes IP addresses, but maintains the same hostname
>through a mec
This is a hypothetical scenario, but does mosh work if the
server changes IP addresses, but maintains the same hostname
through a mechanism like dynamic DNS?
The idea to be able to maintain a login session to a mobile
server device that is wandering around different wireless
networks and getti
Keith Winstein writes:
> Hello Jeremie,
Hi,
> These both look good. Could you please add a Signed-off-by:, and
> ideally file them as a pull request on github.com/keithw/mosh ?
OK for Signed-off-by...
> If you can't do a github pull request, that's ok, but it's easiest for us.
... but please
Hey Phillipp,
* Philipp Haselwarter [2013-04-16 09:02:11 +0200]:
> what is the meaning of signed-off-by's in the context of the mosh
> project?
This is not related to mosh directly, you can also find this in other
projects like git or the Linux kernel.
Basically you add a:
Signed-off-by: Phi
Hi,
what is the meaning of signed-off-by's in the context of the mosh
project?
cheers,
--
Philipp Haselwarter
___
mosh-devel mailing list
mosh-devel@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mosh-devel
14 matches
Mail list logo
