Okay, no worries; I understand. Thanks for the pointer in the right
direction.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Keith Winstein
wrote:
> Hi Zach -- I think, frankly, a rigorous spec is unlikely to happen soon
> unless somebody really wants it. Most of the demand we get has been for new
> features
Hi Zach -- I think, frankly, a rigorous spec is unlikely to happen soon
unless somebody really wants it. Most of the demand we get has been for new
features (scrollback, SSH-agent forwarding, server-side roaming, better
handling of new Unicode characters), many of which will require protocol
mods a
Thanks Keith. Any plans to codify SSP into an RFC? I ask because it makes
the barrier for entry as a developer lower, and easier to sell SSP as a
good technical decision to a business or development team.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Keith Winstein
wrote:
> Short answer is, yes, source code i
Short answer is, yes, source code is basically the definitive reference
(and mosh-paper.pdf / mosh-paper-draft.pdf). The state-synchronized objects
that define the Mosh protocol are in
https://github.com/mobile-shell/mosh/tree/master/src/statesync
Best regards,
Keith
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:08 P
Hi,
I've trolled through the mosh-devel archives and didn't see an answer to
this; is there a specification or RFC for SSP, or is (
https://mosh.mit.edu/mosh-paper-draft.pdf) the definitive source (along
with the mosh source code)?
Thanks!
___
mosh-deve
