On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 07:50:25PM -0400, Alex Chernyakhovsky wrote:
| >From my reading of
| https://github.com/google/protobuf/blob/master/CHANGES.txt#L187, there
| are no wire-level differences. As long as mosh builds, it should
| stil=l be compatible across protobuf versions. I recently
Good question!
We have a (small) crypto-focused test suite that gets run from "make check"
and as part of building the Debian/Ubuntu packages (and possibly
Fedora/EPEL?), but it doesn't test protocol interoperability among versions
of mosh that were compiled differently.
It would be great to do a
Hi Alex,
thankyou for the quick and reassuring response.
btw, is there a test suite to help confirm the hypothesis?
James
On 15/05/15 09:50 AM, Alex Chernyakhovsky wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> From my reading of
> https://github.com/google/protobuf/blob/master/CHANGES.txt#L187, there
> are no wire-l
Hi James,
>From my reading of
https://github.com/google/protobuf/blob/master/CHANGES.txt#L187, there
are no wire-level differences. As long as mosh builds, it should
stil=l be compatible across protobuf versions. I recently rebuilt
Fedora's mosh to work against libprotobuf.so.9, which IIRC is 2.6.
Hi mosh-devel,
I've observed that Google Protobuf has made some incompatible
changes between v2.5 and 2.6.1.
When I built mosh for Solaris (internal testing / evaluation
work), I used 2.5 and all seemed well. I built it again today
using 2.6.1 - and again, all seems ok, but the protobuf generated