[mou] A response to the post of Bernard P. Friel

2008-10-08 Thread Bernard P. Friel
Ladies and Gentlemen, There is an excellent editorial in the Wednesday October 8th edition of the Highland Villager on the Constitutional amendment that does an excellent in depth analysis. Bernie Friel -- Bernard P. Friel Web Pages - http://www.wampy.com ; http://www.wampy.com/

[mou] A response to the post of Bernard P. Friel

2008-10-08 Thread Terence Brashear
OK, back to bird sightings. I think the point has been made here. Thank you for your input. Terry Brashear Hennepin County, MN http://www.naturepixels.com birdnird AT yahoo.com --- On Wed, 10/8/08, Bernard P. Friel wrote: > From: Bernard P. Friel > Subject: Re: [mou] A response to th

[mou] A response to the post of Bernard P. Friel

2008-10-06 Thread Bernard P. Friel
Ladies and Gentlemen, The purpose of my post was to point out that the the message, in which the recommendation of the Board of the MOU was contained, could only be interpreted as designed to stifle any discussion on the pros and cons of the Constitutional Amendment which was the subject of t

[mou] A response to the post of Bernard P. Friel

2008-10-05 Thread Eric Harrold
Folks, ? Being that an opportunity presented itself, let me ask a question that has puzzled me for some time. I've been a member of birding forums in North Carolina and Virginia. Political discussions as they pertain to bird conservation are frowned upon by some folks who would no doubt describe