"Devendra Badhani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for the response. > > I tried with SDK ver 5.0, even with that there are some > leaks, though lesser than what I observed with 3.0. > The interesting thing is that with both the versions, calling > unbind restores the memory usage to almost the same > (a little bit more) than what the application started with. > It seems some responses are getting accumulated with > the "ld" pointer which are not accounted for. > > Seems like I will have to switch to another library, most > probably OpenLdap.
If, instead, you could work with us to track down the leaks in the 5.0 SDK, we'd be forever grateful; we'd like to be rid them also. Do your memory leak tracing tools give any useful info with the v5 code? Dan
