Yet another place where the core of Mozilla is alive and kicking. I agree,
Mozilla is obviously dead. ;P
It must be using a pretty old version; there hasn't been a need for RSA
Data Security code in Mozilla since last year sometime.
Gerv
Hi,
I am using Mozilla 0.9 with Ximian and works pretty well.
First, you should uninstall all the mozilla 0.8.1 RPMs. (Use the
--nodeps and --force options)
Then install 0.9 RPMs as regular.
Lastly you should delete /usr/lib/mozilla-0.8.1 directory,
and make a symbolic link from
I remember somebody posting (after 0.9 was released) that a new theme
(modern I think) had been put into Mozilla. A couple of days ago I
checked a nightly and saw some really pretty cool icons in the mail tool
etc. However it was a little unstable so I didn't install. Now the
change appears
0.9 is very stable and fast for me.
In fact, now I am using Mozilla 0.9 as the only browser and deleted all
the others. (Opera, Netscape 4.77).
In article xdrN6.62543$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter
Moscatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently using Mozilla 0.8 and now see there is a newer
G'Day Ecmel,
Well I have taken the plunge and installed 0.9 and so far so good.
Pete
Ecmel ERCAN wrote:
0.9 is very stable and fast for me.
In fact, now I am using Mozilla 0.9 as the only browser and deleted all
the others. (Opera, Netscape 4.77).
In article xdrN6.62543$[EMAIL
Has anyone had a problem loading www.msnbc.com? Every time I load this
page with Mozilla, I get areas on the page with nothing. Just blotches
of white here and there.
Is it just me, or did I wake up on the wrong side of the bed this
morning. First of all, the nightly I picked up yesterday has become
more stable. Things are really coming together very nicely. A lot of
clean up - a lot of dust off of everything and things are a bit more
tidy. The program
Kevin Brown wrote:
How do I mark all messages in a newsgroup or mail folder as read? It
was shift-c when on a folder in messenger, but that doesn't seem to work
in mozilla.
Thanks,
Kevin
Look at the menus. The correct key combination should be listed next to
the operation name.
My system, mozilla 2001051804 win 98, seems to take an awful amount of
time resolving host when I brouse to a new URL. What is it doing? Is it
doing it on my system or the ISP? Can it be made faster. If it is a
Mozilla issue it should be checked into.
Thanks
--
Howard M. Stark
337 Mildahn
Pierre Wieder wrote:
Hey
Why does Mozilla/mail take up to 2 minutes just to start up?
(P3-550Mhz/256Mb RAM Win2k)
What build are you using?
I'm on Windows 98 SE right now, mail just takes 10 seconds
on first start after clicking the icon on the browser,
probably 20 seconds if I
Why does Mozilla/mail take up to 2 minutes just to start up?
(P3-550Mhz/256Mb RAM Win2k)
eh, that's funny. My pentium 60 with 96RAM starts Mozilla 0.9 (Linux) in
about 2 minutes too! :D
where as my laptop, a 233 PII with 64 RAM starts Mozilla 0.9 in aprox. 20
seconds (both Linux, and
You mean accounts? It's a fairly new install, so anything isn't too
large yet. But otherwise it's a good guess in my oppinion..
Micah Harwell wrote:
Why does Mozilla/mail take up to 2 minutes just to start up?
(P3-550Mhz/256Mb RAM Win2k)
Sometimes large profiles will cause a slowdown.
Pierre Wieder wrote:
Yah, but I actually do NOT think it has anything to do with the amount
of CPU. I bet it's an error, or an option that doesn't werk allrigt...
obviously, i was just joking around :)
I know you were, but others might not. So I just made it clear for the
sake being.
Bren.. wrote:
Pierre Wieder wrote:
Yah, but I actually do NOT think it has anything to do with the amount
of CPU. I bet it's an error, or an option that doesn't werk allrigt...
obviously, i was just
Could someone describe for me what an OJI plugin needs to do with
respects to implementing nsIModule? I'm an interested in understanding
how the browser queries the DLL that contains the plugin.
Under the current, documented, scheme the browser looks for a function
[NSGetFactory()] and uses
Alex wrote:
Justin E. Harlow III wrote:
I can't find any info on whether Mozilla 0.9 supports 128 bit
encryption, although I suspect it does not. I went to a site that
wanted this feature, and it directed me to a Netscape download site
that said I was using Netscape 5.0 (is there such
Howard M. Stark wrote:
My system, mozilla 2001051804 win 98, seems to take an awful amount of
time resolving host when I brouse to a new URL. What is it doing? Is it
doing it on my system or the ISP? Can it be made faster. If it is a
Mozilla issue it should be checked into.
Thanks
Henri Sivonen wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
since Bank of America seems to block Mozilla also
That's bad. Why do they do it? Wells Fargo is (was?) reportedly blocking
Mozilla because they were afraid of form manager. Does this mean that
American
I just tried to install 2001-05-23-09-trunk [ Win98se ].
First I tried the -sea-installer version; when it started up I got the
splash screen, then the profile chooser, then it said Cannot find
navigator, make sure the name is spelled correctly, then I got a blank
window.
So I downloaded the
Heikki Toivonen wrote:
Yup. sarcasmBehold the high tech leaders of the free world./sarcasm
Well, I obviously haven't checked all American online banks, but
permanent login password seems to be the norm. As far as I know
most European banks use one-time passwords...
What exactly do you
And it came to pass that Pierre Wieder wrote:
Yah, but I actually do NOT think it has anything to do with
the amount of CPU. I bet it's an error, or an option that
doesn't werk allrigt...
Works fine on a fast CPU and lots of RAM.
On a K6-2 300 and 128 MB, it opens in around 20 seconds.
On a
Gervase Markham wrote:
Yet another place where the core of Mozilla is alive and kicking. I agree,
Mozilla is obviously dead. ;P
It must be using a pretty old version; there hasn't been a need for RSA
Data Security code in Mozilla since last year sometime.
It's probably the same base
22 matches
Mail list logo
