Re: .97 2002010508 (win32) - A keeper!

2002-01-06 Thread Sören Kuklau
Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on preferences opening. Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This build really seems to be the best I've used so far, in every way. In fact, come on, . . . pop the

Re: .97 2002010508 (win32) - A keeper!

2002-01-06 Thread Dan Howard
Sören Kuklau wrote: Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on preferences opening. I had this same problem with 2002010508 (and can't find 11 for Win32). I went back to 2002010403 with good results.

Re: .97 2002010508 (win32) - A keeper!

2002-01-06 Thread Sören Kuklau
Maybe it was 2002-01-05-08... can't remember. Dan Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Sören Kuklau wrote: Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on preferences opening. I had this same problem with

Re: .97 2002010508 (win32) - A keeper!

2002-01-06 Thread Nigel L
Sören Kuklau wrote: Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on preferences opening. Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This build really seems to be the best I've used Mark -- e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] But

Re: .97 2002010508 (win32) - A keeper!

2002-01-06 Thread Jay Garcia
On 01/06/2002 2:01 PM, Nigel L wrote: Sören Kuklau wrote: Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on preferences opening. Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This build really seems to be the best I've

Re: .97 2002010508 (win32) - A keeper!

2002-01-06 Thread Fulvio Perini
Nigel L wrote: Sören Kuklau wrote: Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on preferences opening. Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This build really seems to be the best I've used Mark --

Re: .97 2002010508 (win32) - A keeper!

2002-01-06 Thread Jay Garcia
On 01/06/2002 2:23 PM, Fulvio Perini wrote: Nigel L wrote: Sören Kuklau wrote: Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on preferences opening. Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This build really seems

Re: .97 2002010508 (win32) - A keeper!

2002-01-06 Thread Nigel L
Jay Garcia wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> On 01/06/2002 2:01 PM, Nigel L wrote: Sren Kuklau wrote: Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash onpreferences opening."Mark" [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL

Re: .97 2002010508 (win32) - A keeper!

2002-01-06 Thread Jay Garcia
On 01/06/2002 3:22 PM, Nigel L wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 01/06/2002 2:01 PM, Nigel L wrote: Sören Kuklau wrote: Yup, that one was good. 2002-01-05-11 though isn't that good - crash on preferences opening. Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL

.97 2002010508 (win32) - A keeper!

2002-01-05 Thread Mark
This build really seems to be the best I've used so far, in every way. In fact, come on, . . . pop the champagne cork and call it 1.0. :) Mark -- e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]