At 18:47 18/12/2000 +0100, Peter Lairo wrote:
you guys just don't get it. Nobody is asking for some all inclusive security
system. What is merely requested is a simple and convenient way to "hinder"
casual,
I don't think anyone is under the misapprehension that you're suggesting
all inclusive
At 13:44 18/12/2000 -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
"Simon P. Lucy" wrote:
It is an optimal solution if you define optimal to be the best
possible cost
versus benefit. Most users use win9x which has virtually NO "Permission
management". Anyhow, the password would be far from not doing
you guys just don't get it. Nobody is asking for some all inclusive security
system. What is merely requested is a simple and convenient way to "hinder"
casual,
accidental peeping into ones e-mail. This is similar to password protecting an
excel file or wordperfect document. Simple.
"Simon P.
"Simon P. Lucy" wrote:
It is an optimal solution if you define optimal to be the best possible cost
versus benefit. Most users use win9x which has virtually NO "Permission
management". Anyhow, the password would be far from not doing "anything". 99%
of unintentional or novice snooping is
