Re: beonex.com or beonex.org?

2002-03-24 Thread Ben Bucksch
Norman wrote: I think the thing that discourages anyone from considering Beonex is that it appears that the site has been abandoned. I am entirely aware of that. If all goes well, there'll be a release based on Mozilla 1.0. I'm working on it at the moment. I downloaded 0.6 some months

Re: beonex.com or beonex.org?

2002-03-24 Thread Sören Kuklau
Is there a way to still get 0.6 some way? There is 0.7 build for Win32 available, and I'd like to see what Beonex looks / feels like :-) -- Regards, Sören Kuklau ('Chucker') [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: beonex.com or beonex.org?

2002-03-24 Thread Senator Dan Burton
Ben Bucksch wrote: Norman wrote: I think the thing that discourages anyone from considering Beonex is that it appears that the site has been abandoned. I am entirely aware of that. If all goes well, there'll be a release based on Mozilla 1.0. I'm working on it at the moment. I

Re: beonex.com or beonex.org?

2002-03-24 Thread Ben Bucksch
Senator Dan Burton wrote: What are the advantages of Beonex over straight Moz at the moment, sir? Thx. http://www.beonex.com/communicator/doc/vsmozilla.html Also Higher level of security / privacy by default

Re: beonex.com or beonex.org?

2002-03-24 Thread Ben Bucksch
Sören Kuklau wrote: Is there a way to still get 0.6 some way? There is 0.7 build for Win32 available, and I'd like to see what Beonex looks / feels like :-) I might have some unreleased Win32 build lying around. However, don't use any current Beonex build for anything serious, because they

Re: beonex.com or beonex.org?

2002-03-16 Thread Gervase Markham
Maybe mirror the patchmaker homepage I'd appreciate it if people didn't do that :-) - see if you can make it even easier to use patchmaker with beonex than with mozilla[1]. Of He'll have a job, as I'm working hard at making it as easy to use as possible with Mozilla ;-) Gerv

beonex.com or beonex.org?

2002-03-14 Thread Ben Bucksch
Hi, the official site for Beonex Communicator is currently http://www.beonex.com/communicator. I am wondering if the .com and the otherwise commercial-looking nature of the site discourages Mozilla contributors from helping make Beonex Communicator a great version of Mozilla, well-suited for

Re: beonex.com or beonex.org?

2002-03-14 Thread Stuart Ballard
is the opposite, and that has its downsides too: an end-user who found themselves at mozilla.org would be a bit lost if they wanted anything other than downloads. I think there's room for both beonex.com and beonex.org. Present beonex.org as the homepage when making release announcements, calls for volunteers

Re: beonex.com or beonex.org?

2002-03-14 Thread Ben Bucksch
nice, leave some money. I think there's room for both beonex.com and beonex.org. Present beonex.org as the homepage when making release announcements, calls for volunteers, etc on mozilla newsgroups and the like. People on those groups are more likely to be developers than end-users. Mention both