Re: For JTK (read)Re: No need to thank me

2002-03-11 Thread DeMoN LaG

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10 Mar
2002: 

 Okay you are the idiot who demanded the developers rewite some of
 the download dialogue box since you didn't like how it worked and
 buggered up the Mac build which caused Mac developers a week's
 worth of fustration. ;) Thanks.  Why don't you take credit for
 accomplishing something other than long thread burning profusely
 where ever you post! 

The last time I saw anything from JTK about downloading, he posted 
sample code that he claimed would work.  It included an undefined 
function, and 2 undefined variables.  When I said Where is 
|whatever| declared? he told me, in more or less words You are the 
Mozilla lover, you should know.  So I posted back with search 
results from the source, yielding the variables did not exist 
anywhere, and the function he was claiming was only defined in the 
mail import module.  He never commented on it again.  Even after 
asking him how expected his code to work when it wouldn't even 
compile, he said nothing.  He's a troll, and obviously has nothing 
better to do with himself than try to tell other people how to do 
things that even he can't do.  Killfiling him has made my stress 
level drop so much, you should try it

-- 
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m




For JTK (read)Re: No need to thank me

2002-03-10 Thread pbergsagel

Okay you are the idiot who demanded the developers rewite some of the 
download dialogue box since you didn't like how it worked and buggered 
up the Mac build which caused Mac developers a week's worth of 
fustration. ;) Thanks.  Why don't you take credit for accomplishing 
something other than long thread burning profusely where ever you post!

JTK wrote:
 gavin long wrote:
 
 JTK wrote:

 You'll notice that my bitching finally got AOL to add the two-line 
 percent complete in the download progress box title fix that I 
 posted a while back.