Reading the re-licensing web pages and FAQs etc., it is my unterstanding
that the triple license approach has been chosen to allow mozilla code
to used in GPLed Larger Works. Has this already happened many times?
Just thinking through a little example, I guess I am either confused or
I get
Ralf Hauser wrote:
ii) Contributor G applies Modification 1 and creates a
ContributorVersionGPL.C with it, licenses it with GPL and includes it
in her GPL Larger Work.
This is expressedly discouraged by both mozilla.org and Richard Stallman.
1) I guess T does not have the right to just
