Amir Herzberg wrote:
> I wonder: was the mere fact of you meeting with them a secret? If so,
> did you get permission to disclose this secret (was it declassified)?
The existence of the meeting was not a secret.
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/gerv/archives/008126.html
> It must have been `top secret` since you were forced to take evasive
> actions, i.e. tell us you need usability tests, criteria, code, etc.
> when you simply could have said that you decided to follow a specific
> direction and are not currently interested in outside contributions.
> This would have been the right thing to do, imho.
Why do you persist in seeing this as an either/or, black-and-white
thing? Just because we are improving the certificate UI doesn't mean
that all your work is suddenly invalid or unwanted. I'm very interested
in what you are doing. I'm not yet convinced any of the suggested
outside contributions are a good fit for Firefox. That doesn't mean that
won't change in the future.
Gerv
_______________________________________________
Mozilla-security mailing list
Mozilla-security@mozilla.org
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
