We're not using the command line interface, but the API. To answer
your question, in this case, we are calling:
status = lame_set_mode(mPrivateData-mLameFlags, MONO);
-Stevo Brock
Head of Development
Monkey Tools
www.monkey-tools.com
On Oct 19, 2007, at 12:54
And in fact that is what is interesting. -q 9 gives the best
results. -q0 creates strange artifacts in the file.
-Stevo
On Oct 19, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Manoj Bist wrote:
Perhaps you should use -q 2 (this is the default).
-q 0 is the highest quality and -q 9 is the lowest quality.
On
Perhaps you should use -q 2 (this is the default).
-q 0 is the highest quality and -q 9 is the lowest quality.
On 10/19/07, Stevo Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
We are trying to use LAME to encode a WAVE file to a 44.1kHz, 64Kbps,
CBR mono mp3 file and are having trouble matching
Hello Stevo,
Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007 21:35 schrieb Stevo Brock:
Hi list,
We are trying to use LAME to encode a WAVE file to a 44.1kHz, 64Kbps,
CBR mono mp3 file and are having trouble matching the quality of the
same file produced by ProTools.
how about this, it uses similar lowpass as
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MP3 encoders development list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:35:25 -0700
To: MP3 encoders development list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
Subject: [mp3encoder] 44.1kHz, 64Kbps, CBR mono encoding question
Hi list,
We are trying to use LAME to encode
