Re: [MP3 ENCODER] -q1
Roel> The graphs you provided show a lower noise, this because --nspsytune Roel> probably. It simply sounds poor, really poor. It sounds nothing like Roel> the original on my headphones. Roel> Roel> I use the one with the "RH extensions" from Dmitry. (thanks for all Roel> the compiles and hard work Dmitry btw!) --nspsytune doesn't work correctly if RH extensions are enabled. Robert: Have RH extensions already become default? If not, I think it's confusing if there are two binaries. What are advantages of selecting options at compile time? I think selecting experimental options via command line options is more handy. -- Naoki Shibata e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] -q1
Robert Hegemann schrieb: > Mark Powell schrieb am Mon, 02 Okt 2000: > > On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote: > > > > > does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1 > > > gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ? > > > > >From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only rarely > > give a sonic improvement. In fact it is more likely to degrade the sound > > over -q2? If so, the Roel recommendation of -q1, seems a little dangerous? > > You think the extra ~5% file size, that encoding using -q2 requires, > > usually provides superior sound quality? > > I don't know any track where the use of -q1 improves sound quality > compared to a same sized -q2. That's why I'm asking you all. > > Ciao Robert Why not making q1 default for only V5V9 Bye Stephan > > > -- > MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ ) -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] -q1
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote: > > >From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only rarely > > give a sonic improvement. In fact it is more likely to degrade the sound > > over -q2? If so, the Roel recommendation of -q1, seems a little dangerous? > > You think the extra ~5% file size, that encoding using -q2 requires, > > usually provides superior sound quality? > > I don't know any track where the use of -q1 improves sound quality > compared to a same sized -q2. That's why I'm asking you all. To be honest I haven't spotted any difference. I don't have decent headphones and find listening tests on my HiFi arduous. I'll stick with -h if there's some doubt over the quality of -q1. I like the extra encode speed too :) I think Roel is the fella who swears by -q1. Maybe he's best to ask? Cheers. Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford Academic Information Services, Clifford Whitworth Building, Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 5936 Fax: +44 161 295 5888 www.pgp.com for PGP key -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] -q1
Mark Powell schrieb am Mon, 02 Okt 2000: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote: > > > does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1 > > gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ? > > >From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only rarely > give a sonic improvement. In fact it is more likely to degrade the sound > over -q2? If so, the Roel recommendation of -q1, seems a little dangerous? > You think the extra ~5% file size, that encoding using -q2 requires, > usually provides superior sound quality? I don't know any track where the use of -q1 improves sound quality compared to a same sized -q2. That's why I'm asking you all. Ciao Robert -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] -q1
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote: > does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1 > gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ? >From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only rarely give a sonic improvement. In fact it is more likely to degrade the sound over -q2? If so, the Roel recommendation of -q1, seems a little dangerous? You think the extra ~5% file size, that encoding using -q2 requires, usually provides superior sound quality? Cheers. Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford Academic Information Services, Clifford Whitworth Building, Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 5936 Fax: +44 161 295 5888 www.pgp.com for PGP key -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
