Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Intel Compiler
Dmitry wrote: > Hello John, > > Saturday, September 30, 2000, 2:38:44 AM, you wrote: > > JS> Dmitry wrote: > > >> NT users, please, test this compile: > >> http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/lame387mmx.zip > > JS> I can't get any of the Intel compiled exe's to run on my old pentium pro > JS> 200 under Win2k. Both of the 3.88a1's from Joshua crash and so does the > JS> new MMX from Dmitry - as an external compressor to EAC. > > try this > http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/lame387.zip The lame387 (9/30/00 version ic 4.5) works great, 15% + speed increase and no crashing. Thanks! -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Intel Compiler
Dmitry wrote: > NT users, please, test this compile: > http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/lame387mmx.zip I can't get any of the Intel compiled exe's to run on my old pentium pro 200 under Win2k. Both of the 3.88a1's from Joshua crash and so does the new MMX from Dmitry - as an external compressor to EAC. The only one that works is the 'lame387' - 3.87beta (9/26) release. Is it looking for MMX on my processor and then crashing, or is there something different in the 3.88 code that would do it? -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Intel Compiler
NT users, please, test this compile: http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/lame387mmx.zip Best regards, Dmitrymail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Intel Compiler
Joshua Bahnsen schrieb am Fre, 29 Sep 2000: > Basically, all I did was use the default switches in the VC workspace and > added /QaxiM (so in the MSVC makefile, there was only difference, I never > even looked at it though), I wasn't sure what else to add, I went to Intel's > web page and looked at a list of all of the switches, but wasn't sure what > else to use. I tested both versions (VC and IC) with 7 or 8 different mp3s, > all produced the same output, byte-for-byte, but those are just the files I > tested (Goldie & Adam F, drum & bass). Maybe there are cases where the IC > will screw it up, but so far I never noticed a difference. > > Josh So it will be OK. When I had problems with the Intel Compiler settings the whole MP3 was broken, but it was really fast! Ciao Robert -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Intel Compiler
Basically, all I did was use the default switches in the VC workspace and added /QaxiM (so in the MSVC makefile, there was only difference, I never even looked at it though), I wasn't sure what else to add, I went to Intel's web page and looked at a list of all of the switches, but wasn't sure what else to use. I tested both versions (VC and IC) with 7 or 8 different mp3s, all produced the same output, byte-for-byte, but those are just the files I tested (Goldie & Adam F, drum & bass). Maybe there are cases where the IC will screw it up, but so far I never noticed a difference. Josh - Original Message - From: "Robert Hegemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 10:00 AM Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Intel Compiler Joshua Bahnsen schrieb am Fre, 29 Sep 2000: > > There is only a problem with the Intel compiler if you compile on Win 95/98. If you actually use Win NT/2000 as your OS, binaries compiled with the Intel compiler run just fine on NT/2000 and ME/95/98. If you want an example, I've posted binaries of both VC5 and IC on http://www.geocities.com/archie69bj, I noticed that they run 10-15% faster on 2000 than with ME, it's nice. I also screwed around and added a version tab... Anyway, if you use Win2K and want a faster binary, here is one... > > Josh > My experiences with the Intel compiler are, that you can tune it to produce faster code, but I had often a version that screwed down the quality. If you found some interesting working compile switches, maybe you will share them with us? By the way, the switches in Makefile.MSVC are tuned for my Pentium MMX. Ciao Robert -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ ) -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Intel Compiler
Joshua Bahnsen schrieb am Fre, 29 Sep 2000: > > There is only a problem with the Intel compiler if you compile on Win 95/98. If you >actually use Win NT/2000 as your OS, binaries compiled with the Intel compiler run >just fine on NT/2000 and ME/95/98. If you want an example, I've posted binaries of >both VC5 and IC on http://www.geocities.com/archie69bj, I noticed that they run >10-15% faster on 2000 than with ME, it's nice. I also screwed around and added a >version tab... Anyway, if you use Win2K and want a faster binary, here is one... > > Josh > My experiences with the Intel compiler are, that you can tune it to produce faster code, but I had often a version that screwed down the quality. If you found some interesting working compile switches, maybe you will share them with us? By the way, the switches in Makefile.MSVC are tuned for my Pentium MMX. Ciao Robert -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Intel Compiler
This is great Joshua! On my Celeron 400 under Win2k it's 15 to 21 % faster then Dmitry's VC compiled binary. Regards, Wim Speekenbrink - Original Message - From: Joshua Bahnsen To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 5:57 AM Subject: [MP3 ENCODER] Intel Compiler There is only a problem with the Intel compiler if you compile on Win 95/98. If you actually use Win NT/2000 as your OS, binaries compiled with the Intel compiler run just fine on NT/2000 and ME/95/98. If you want an example, I've posted binaries of both VC5 and IC on http://www.geocities.com/archie69bj, I noticed that they run 10-15% faster on 2000 than with ME, it's nice. I also screwed around and added a version tab... Anyway, if you use Win2K and want a faster binary, here is one... Josh
