Re: [MP3 ENCODER] wav/riff header support and preciseness of lame

2000-10-01 Thread Albert Faber



Gabriel,
I don't think is very complicated to add the CDex Riff-Wav 
code to Lame front-end, maybe later this week I have some time to implement this 

Albert
 
- Original Message - 
From: Gabriel 
Bouvigne 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] wav/riff header support and preciseness 
of lame


>- Lame does not support outputting to a wav 
file with mp3 compression (a mp3 with wav header). Since these files are 
>needed for programs like virtualdub (for combining video and audio), this 
feature would make lame even more complete.
 
I agree about this. I'd also like to see this feature in Lame. 
It would be nice if someone would add a --l3wav option to Lame (note: this 
shouldn't be too difficult as it's already implemented in cdex)
 

>- 'Preciseness' of lame: when I encode a wav 
file with a length of 97 minutes and 4 seconds, the resulting mp3 is only 97 
>minutes and 3 seconds. This impreciseness is much smaller than the 
fraunhofer codec's as found in AudioActive >Production Studio 2.04 (about 5 
seconds shorter), but nevertheless unwanted. For perfect video and audio 
combining, the >tracks should be exactly the same length. 
 
How to be sure that it's not a decoder problem? It seems that some decoders 
report false durations, even for cbr encoding.
 
 
Regards,
 
--
 
Gabriel Bouvigne - France[EMAIL PROTECTED]mobile phone: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]icq: 12138873
 
MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org


Re: [MP3 ENCODER] wav/riff header support and preciseness of lame

2000-10-01 Thread Dmitry

Hello Frank,

Sunday, October 01, 2000, 4:43:12 PM, you wrote:

FL>  -  Lame  does  not  support  outputting  to  a  wav file with mp3
FL>  compression (a mp3 with wav header). Since these files are needed
FL> for programs like virtualdub (for combining video and audio), this
FL> feature would make lame even more complete.

there are programs that can add/delete wav header to/from  mp3/wav


Best regards,
 Dmitrymail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )



Re: [MP3 ENCODER] wav/riff header support and preciseness of lame

2000-10-01 Thread Gabriel Bouvigne




>- Lame does not support outputting to a wav 
file with mp3 compression (a mp3 with wav header). Since these files are 
>needed for programs like virtualdub (for combining video and audio), this 
feature would make lame even more complete.
 
I agree about this. I'd also like to see this feature in Lame. 
It would be nice if someone would add a --l3wav option to Lame (note: this 
shouldn't be too difficult as it's already implemented in cdex)
 

>- 'Preciseness' of lame: when I encode a wav 
file with a length of 97 minutes and 4 seconds, the resulting mp3 is only 97 
>minutes and 3 seconds. This impreciseness is much smaller than the 
fraunhofer codec's as found in AudioActive >Production Studio 2.04 (about 5 
seconds shorter), but nevertheless unwanted. For perfect video and audio 
combining, the >tracks should be exactly the same length. 
 
How to be sure that it's not a decoder problem? It seems that some decoders 
report false durations, even for cbr encoding.
 
 
Regards,
 
--
 
Gabriel Bouvigne - France[EMAIL PROTECTED]mobile phone: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]icq: 12138873
 
MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org


Re: [MP3 ENCODER] wav/riff header support and preciseness of lame

2000-10-01 Thread David Bridson

> - Lame does not support outputting to a wav file with mp3
> compression (a mp3 with wav header). Since these files
> are needed for programs like virtualdub (for combining
> video and audio), this feature would make lame even more
> complete.

Don't use LAME - use CDEx with its LAME plugin:

http://www.cdex.n3.net/

I think the downloadable version comes with a slightly older version of
lame. For the newest version of the LAME plugin, try:

http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/

> - 'Preciseness' of lame: when I encode a wav file with a
> length of 97 minutes and 4 seconds, the resulting mp3 is
> only 97 minutes and 3 seconds. This impreciseness is much
> smaller than the fraunhofer codec's as found in
> AudioActive Production Studio 2.04 (about 5 seconds
> shorter), but nevertheless unwanted. For perfect video
> and audio combining, the tracks should be exactly the
> same length.

I've found LAME to be perfectly precise - i've made AVIs with LAMEd
soundtracks well over 3 hours in length in which the sountrack has
maintained perfect sync with the video. Perhaps the programmes you're using
to find the length of the individual files are incorrect. The only way i'd
test for incorrectness would be to test with an AVI file - if the video and
audio still sync after three hours, then it doesn't matter what some
programme tells me - I know that it works.

David

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )