Re: [mpd-devel] Was this change reverted by accident?

On Thu, 02 Mar, 2017 at 02:15:50 GMT, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Ah, indeed. Sorry for the noise. Heh, sorry for that (and this) noise; I got this thread mixed up with my other recent mpd mails. --Ben ___ mpd-devel mailing list mpd-devel@musicpd.org

Re: [mpd-devel] Was this change reverted by accident?

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 19:43:12 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote: > It was not reverted - look what happens after these lines, now that > the "return" is removed. > > Hint: "git show -W 021519f" might be just enough context to understand > this commit. Ah, indeed. Sorry for the noise. --Ben

Re: [mpd-devel] Was this change reverted by accident?

On 2017/02/27 17:22, Eric Wollesen wrote: > It was merged, but then immediately it seems to have been reverted in this > commit: > > 021519f command/QueueCommands: eliminate duplicate code in > handle_addid() It was not reverted - look what happens after these lines, now

Re: [mpd-devel] [PATCH] ReusableArray: fix build error on GCC7

On 2017/02/27 03:34, Ben Boeckel wrote: > GCC7 outputs the following error without this change: > > src/util/ReusableArray.hxx:61:35: error: no matching function for call to > ???swap(size_t&, const size_t&)??? >std::swap(capacity, src.capacity); > > which can