Hi all, I'd like to announce a (re-)reading for the upcoming Mar'23 meeting.
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/639 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/750 Changes since last reading (basically a complete re-write of the affected sentence): https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/750/files/78353ac06a93a01db2d5afa3fe99d7d034983a2e..ea435a915436313033430b2e8da219675947bb65 PDF (with highlights, p68): https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/files/10785518/mpi41-report_Issue639_MPI_WAIT-is-nonlocal-except-when-it-isnt_79762fb1.pdf I would also like to request a 2nd vote for the following issues that have passed a 1st vote: Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/188 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/203 Summary: state that Example 3.10 is unsafe Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/83 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/666 Summary: new Info key for strict start order of persistent collective operations Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/472 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/606 Summary: disambiguate "rank" in the point-to-point chapter Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/117 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/748 Summary: "logically concurrent" might not be - advice All these are unchanged since their 1st vote state. Best wishes, Dan.
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum
