Hi all,
I'd like to request time at the Dec'22 meeting for the following issues/PRs:
Reading: Enabled is a semantic term
Issue 421: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/421
PR 760: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/760
Reading: Unsafe example relies on MPI providing
Hi Jeff,
When adding session as an object to MPI, a deliberate choice was made not to
support attributes for session objects because “attributes in MPI suck”.
This decision was made despite the usage (by some tools) of “at exit” attribute
callbacks fired by the destruction of MPI_COMM_SELF
Hi all,
I believe “orthogonality” here is intended to mean “every object needs this
feature” rather than “every Forum member needs to be involved” (at least, I
hope so).
We have a single location for attributes-that-have-callbacks: section 7.7 in
MPI-4.0 – although there are also window
Hi all,
No-no-votes for things that were read in Dec'22 voting meeting
Summary: Section 3.5 - p. 45 - Comment Erroneous Example
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/188
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/203
No-no-vote changes:
Hi all,
At the March'23 meeting, I would like to read a modified version of a
clarification for the local/nonlocal nature of MPI_WAIT.
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/639
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/750
PDF:
Hi all,
I'd like to announce a (re-)reading for the upcoming Mar'23 meeting.
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/639
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/750
Changes since last reading (basically a complete re-write of the affected
sentence):
Hi all,
On behalf of the HACC WG, I'd like to announce a no-no vote and a 1st vote for
the memory allocation kinds proposal.
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/580
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/714
No-no:
Hi all,
If we still have time in the procedure for MPI-4.1, I'd like to read an errata
ticket at the next meeting.
Title: Correct the MPI_TESTANY 'as if' wording
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/681
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/818
Best wishes,
Dan.
Hi all,
I'd also like to announce a 1st vote:
Title: MPI_WAIT is nonlocal, except when it isn't
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/639
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/788
Best wishes,
Dan.
From: mpi-forum On Behalf Of Holmes,
Daniel John via mpi-forum
meeting
Hi Dan,
I assume the PR for this should be
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/750 instead? That PR points to
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/669.
Thanks,
Wes
On Apr 11, 2023, at 5:44 AM, Holmes, Daniel John via mpi-forum
mailto:mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org
Hi all,
I'd like to announce a second vote for the "MPI_WAIT is nonlocal, except when
it isn't" issue.
Issue: 639 https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/639
PR: 750 https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/750
Changes since 1st vote: none (except merge of mpi-4.x branch)
Best
Hi all,
I'm going to go ahead and announce the 2nd vote for the "side documents"
proposal.
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/562
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/694
Changes since 1st vote: only chapter committee level tweaks.
Best wishes,
Dan.
Hi all,
I'm stuck with "Waiting for host to start the meeting" as well.
Best wishes,
Dan.
-Original Message-
From: mpiwg-tools On Behalf Of John
DelSignore via mpiwg-tools
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 4:06 PM
To: mpiwg-to...@lists.mpi-forum.org
Cc: DelSignore, John ; MPI Forum
13 matches
Mail list logo