Re: [Mpi-forum] Giving up on C11 _Generic

2019-08-17 Thread Jed Brown via mpi-forum
Joseph Schuchart via mpi-forum writes: >> I'm not taking a position on C11 _Generic in the standard, but it would >> significantly reduce the configure complexity for apps to upgrade to >> MPI_Count without dropping support for previous standards. > > I don't see how C11 _Generic will make life

Re: [Mpi-forum] Giving up on C11 _Generic

2019-08-12 Thread Jed Brown via mpi-forum
"Jeff Squyres \(jsquyres\) via mpi-forum" writes: > Let me ask a simple question: how will users to write portable MPI programs > in C with large count values? > > Answer: they will explicitly call MPI_Send_x(), and not rely on C11 _Generic. Few packages will accept a hard dependency on MPI-4

Re: [Mpi-forum] "BigCount" rendering in PDF

2019-07-31 Thread Jed Brown via mpi-forum
"Jeff Squyres \(jsquyres\) via mpi-forum" writes: > On Jul 31, 2019, at 12:59 PM, Jeff Hammond wrote: >> >> “C++ compilers shall produce the same result as C11 generic.” Why does this >> need to say anything different for profiling and tools? Is this impossible? > > Is there a way to have