Eva Young wrote:
I've never quite understood what the homosexual agenda is.
Stonewall's Agenda:
http://www.StonewallDFL.org/resolutions/resolutions.htm
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's Agenda:
http://www.ngltf.org/issues/index.cfm
Denial is not going to help anyone.
Michael Atherton
At 08:45 AM 10/21/2001 -0500, Michael Atherton wrote:
Eva Young wrote:
I've never quite understood what the homosexual agenda is.
Stonewall's Agenda:
http://www.StonewallDFL.org/resolutions/resolutions.htm
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's Agenda:
http://www.ngltf.org/issues/index.cfm
Michael notes:
Stonewall's Agenda:
http://www.StonewallDFL.org/resolutions/resolutions.htm
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's Agenda:
http://www.ngltf.org/issues/index.cfm
Denial is not going to help anyone.
No, but neither is misdirection.
Remember, this whole debate started
Sorry, there was a bollixed-up paragraph in my last post.
Then, of course, there's the bold-faced stereotyping. In other contexts,
Michael is a resolute advocate of well-designed objective tests. I
challenge him to compile whatever he considers city-level gay agenda
items, then cite believes he
Patrick Peterson wrote:
Scott makes a good point -- if Stenglein campaigned on such homophobic
drivel, it's not hard to see why he lost in the primary.
As I said, Minneapolis politics seems to have a lot to do with placing people
who hold opposing viewpoints on the other side of the rainbow.
