My utmost apologies to all and everyone. Jackie gave me permission to include the following email exchange in a message which clarifies that her husband F. Clayton Tyler has no relationship to any adult oriented businesses in the City of Minneapolis or ELSEWHERE. I will be sharing this information as soon as possible with those individuals who told me these obviously unfounded rumors.
Again, my utmost apologies! Hopefully this has served the purpose of bringing this rumor out from under the rock where it cannot survive the light of day. My apologies for any inconveniencies, pain or hurt, or other harm caused to the parties' involved. Thanks, David Strand See messages below. --- "Cherryhomes, Jackie A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You may include our message, with the addition that > F. Clayton Tyler has no > relationship to any adult oriented businesses in the > City of Minneapolis or > ELSEWHERE. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Strand [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 6:18 PM > > To: Cherryhomes, Jackie A > > Subject: RE: Immediate Retraction & Question > > > > Thank you for the clarifying message. I will > issues > > an additional statement to the list (may I include > > this post for clarification). > > > > Thanks, David Strand > > --- "Cherryhomes, Jackie A" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > F. Clayton Tyler and Jackie Cherryhomes are in > > > receipt of your message. We > > > do not consider it to be either a "retraction" > or an > > > "apology" as the > > > content of the message continues to perpetuate > > > rumors and gossip about F. > > > Clayton Tyler's business relationships. For the > > > record, F. Clayton Tyler > > > has no relationship to any adult oriented > businesses > > > in the City of > > > Minneapolis. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: David Strand [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 5:59 PM > > > > To: Cherryhomes, Jackie A; issues minneapolis > > > > Subject: Re: Immediate Retraction & Question > > > > > > > > I recieved a telephone call this afternoon > asking > > > me > > > > to issue an immediate retraction of two items > in a > > > > previous post entitled "Jackie Cherryhomes and > > > > Prostitution." I regret having reported > concerns > > > > shared with me by a number of North Loop > residents > > > and > > > > business people as fact or implied fact. My > post > > > > implied that the infamous Evan's brothers were > > > clients > > > > of Jackie's husband. I now know that to be > > > erroneous > > > > hearsay. > > > > > > > > I have also been informed that Jackie's > husband is > > > not > > > > a part owner of the sauna next door to Sex > World > > > as > > > > reported to me by residents of the area saying > > > they > > > > had been told so by area police officers. > > > > > > > > I am truly sorry for sharing misinformation > and > > > > furthering hearsay. > > > > > > > > Are any of the adult oriented businesses in or > > > near > > > > downtown clients of your husband that could > have > > > lead > > > > to this conclusion on the parts of residents > or > > > the > > > > police? Obviously there is some bad rumors > being > > > > bandied about this part of ward 5. I am no > fan of > > > > comstockery. I am curious if there is some > benign > > > > client relationships with any of these > businesses > > > or > > > > their owners that could have flowered into > this > > > odious > > > > rumor. > > > > > > > > The more people I heard these statements from > in > > > the > > > > area the more verisimilitude they had. It may > be > > > in > > > > the best interest of the residents to clarify > any > > > > relationships that may exist to clear the air. > > > > > > > > Thanks and with my utmost apologies, David > Strand > > > > > > > > P.S. My home computer is down so I had to go > out > > > and > > > > find a public access computer to use to issue > this > > > > retraction. Thus the time delay beween it's > > > issuance > > > > and the phone call I recieved at 3:20. > > > > --- "Cherryhomes, Jackie A" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Pursuant to our conversation at 3:20 on > Sunday, > > > > > November 4, 2001, I demand > > > > > an immediate retraction of the posting on > the > > > > > Minneapolis Issues List > > > > > regarding me and my wife, Jackie > Cherryhomes, as > > > an > > > > > outright and willful > > > > > dissemination of untruthful information. As > I > > > > > informed you, I do not own > > > > > any interest in any saunas and I have not > > > > > represented any of the Evans > > > > > brothers in their prostitution case. I > expect > > > your > > > > > retraction and apology > > > > > to be posted on the Minneapolis Issues List > by > > > no > > > > > later than 5:00 PM, Sunday > > > > > November 4, 2001. > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Find a job, post your resume. > > > > http://careers.yahoo.com > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Find a job, post your resume. > > http://careers.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
