-Original Message-
From: mel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE:[Mpls] Parking ramp editorial
Is the city's decision to build a $25 million parking ramp a wise one?
Just to service the debt on $25 million will require
Is the city's decision to build a $25 million parking ramp a wise one?
Just to service the debt on $25 million will require $176,694.80
a month with a 25 year loan at 7% interest.
For this kind of money it should have carpet, bath and kitchen.
This amounts to $35,714.29 cost for each of
pay.
David Brauer
King Field - Ward 10
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of David
> Brauer
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Mpls] Parking ramp editorial
>
> About the pa
About the parking ramp editorial...
I'm out in California and away from my files, but I recall Strib
reporter Mike Meyers' Target Store expose indicated that the city
subsidized the Target Store parking ramp with a floor specifically
dedicated to Target shoppers. I think that violates even the St
Well, I'll tell you whose money they're not using to build the ramp, the
Walker's. The Walker has close to $200 million in the bank and the city is
still coughing up the dough for the cost of the ramp.
The City Council says it's an investment because it will be paid back with
user fees. The
Today's Strib has an editorial on the Walker parking ramp, and how
officials should better explain their parking strategy to us:
http://www.startribune.com/stories/561/920187.html
>From the editorial: "Taxpayers contribute not a dime from the city's
general fund into its extensive parking system
