Re: [Mpls] criticizing journalism (for criticizing RT)-- the journalis ts response

2004-02-04 Thread Mike Skoglund
Sorry, I meant to paste in the link to the statute: Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I regret to inform Mr. Snyder that he is, unfortunately, indeed incorrect. > In his own words he stated: "It's actually a use restriction (not a complete > ban because there are exceptions for new lawns, etc.)." > > M

Re: [Mpls] criticizing journalism (for criticizing RT)-- the journalis ts response

2004-02-04 Thread Mike Skoglund
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I regret to inform Mr. Snyder that he is, unfortunately, indeed incorrect. > In his own words he stated: "It's actually a use restriction (not a complete > ban because there are exceptions for new lawns, etc.)." > > My specific point on phosphorus lawn chemicals has b

Re: [Mpls] criticizing journalism (for criticizing RT)-- the journalis ts response

2004-02-04 Thread chrisallison2 . 1
I regret to inform Mr. Snyder that he is, unfortunately, indeed incorrect. In his own words he stated: "It's actually a use restriction (not a complete ban because there are exceptions for new lawns, etc.)." My specific point on phosphorus lawn chemicals has been that there is no ban on them,