The Star Tribune has taken its fair share of abuse in this election
season, some of which I've agreed with. But I'm hoping list members
can help me understand three things as we get to the end of the
campaign:
1) The Star Tribune has been said by some list members to have an
agenda of getting
Steve B. asks:
1) The Star Tribune has been said by some list members to have an
agenda of getting Sayles Belton reelected. Why then did it publish a
poll today showing Rybak ahead by 20 points?
Cover? A clever attempt to make Rybak supporters complacent? grin
2) It was said that the
O.K. Steve, I'll bite:
1) The Star Tribune has been said by some list members to have an
agenda of getting Sayles Belton reelected. Why then did it publish a
poll today showing Rybak ahead by 20 points?
Because they took a poll and that's what they found. And they didn't want
to look
