It seems the more sensible thing to do would be to name it after St. Paul
which has the highest level of government including Federal and Judicial
Federal Offices.
Dave Dix
Ward 6
Phillips
- Original Message -
From: "Wetternach, Vernon A" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Multiple recipients of
Don't even get me started.
Andy Driscoll
St. Paul lover of Minneapolis as long as you don't go overboard
From: "Barbara Nelson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:06:10 -0500
To: "Multiple recipients of list" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Minneapolis
Maybe we should bunch everything between 495 and 695 into one entity and call
it Elf Mountain, that should confuse people read good.
Wizard Marks, Central
Scott McGerik wrote:
Barbara Nelson wrote:
I realize that the census bureau's change in how it designates the area
wouldn't change
That is the smartest articulation I have heard thus
far on this entire matter! Thank you Vernon!
--- "Wetternach, Vernon A"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Barbara Nelson asks the question about dropping the
name of St. Paul from
our census name. One of the issues is that the
Census Bureau
From: Connie Sheppard
... agency ... was reconsidering funding due to the fact that over half
of Many Rivers' proposed units would be three-bedroom. The reason given was
that Many Rivers would be "too dense" and it wouldn't be good to have that
many families (children) so close to Franklin
