ome of the election today, these issues need to be
addressed.
Carol Becker
Longfellow
- Original Message -
From: D.Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 8:16 AM
Subject: Library vote
> I am usually a lurk
I support this one. (could you be any more liberal than this one)
Even if it's botched a bit, I expect that.
If, they could give us something of unique beauty that follows the
purpose of a "new" library I will be satisfied, as someone who uses the
downtown branch it's clear who needs some cash.
V
y family and acquaintance) opinion on the
> library vote as perhaps the voice of those of us who don't "get" the
debate.
>
> We're not voting for it. (We are voting for schools.)
>
> I may be wrong, but the site, method, means and manner of obtaining a new
> ma
om: D.Klein
> I am usually a lurker on this site, mostly because I feel I don't have a
> good grasp of the issues discussed here (but obviously I am interested!) -
> and since I was soundly walloped for my one voiced opinion on graffiti.
> But, I offer my (and others of my fami
Minneapolis citizens have been talking for years about how much we need a new
central library. We don't need more focus groups and discussions on siting.
We need funding.
I'm supporting the referendum. Good libraries are an important symbol of
what we value as a city.
Janet Gendler
Linden
n the
library vote as perhaps the voice of those of us who don't "get" the debate.
We're not voting for it. (We are voting for schools.)
I may be wrong, but the site, method, means and manner of obtaining a new
main library seem seriously flawed, and the corollary branch plans s
