There are a number of unanswered questions in this morning's story about
Steve Bosaker in the Star Tribune, but there are two very troubling issues
to me...both involving boundaries.
1. Why is the Star Tribune giving front page treatment to an alleged
incident involving a person who
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barbara Nelson
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 11:10 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Streets, traffic neighborhood boundaries
Call me insensitive, but I think traffic calming has now gone too far
and has become
blnelson writes:
"I believe the greater good for the greater number is the ethic we should
follow re the use of roads. Too bad if you had the illusion of a quiet
country lane meandering past your home. You only have that guarantee if
you buy on a parkway. Every city needs major collectors and
planning says the
"optimal size of a neighborhood may be one-quarter to one-third of a mile
center to edge...". King Field -- whose only natural boundary is 35W to the
east -- is almost twice that big, from 36th to 46th Sts. S.
Does this mean the city will re-do our boundaries -- and by th
;
An interesting quirk of the neighborhood boundaries issue is evident
at the south edge of Seward. Our border with Longfellow was based
on a railroad track, part of which has recently been removed, leaving
us with a "virtual boundary" that has no physical marker. In fact, this
virtual boundar
whose only natural boundary is 35W to the
east -- is almost twice that big, from 36th to 46th Sts. S.
Does this mean the city will re-do our boundaries -- and by this, I mean
split us up -- or will something happen only if we ask for a change? (The
idea of a split or redraw has been contemp
for the disappearing railroad)
I recently received a mailing from the city planning department (as I recall)
about establishing a process for changing offical neighborhood boundaries.
This strikes me as an important issue and one that probably reveals a real
change from the pre NRP days.
I hope
I recently received a mailing from the city planning department (as I recall)
about establishing a process for changing offical neighborhood boundaries.
This strikes me as an important issue and one that probably reveals a real
change from the pre NRP days.
I hope
0, Cameron A. Gordon wrote:
I recently received a mailing from the city planning department (as I
recall)
about establishing a process for changing offical neighborhood boundaries.
This strikes me as an important issue and one that probably reveals a real
change from the pre NRP days
