I wonder if someone could help.
Currently when an Windows MQ series client connects to the MQ server on
Unix we require that the account exists on both machines.
We now have a problem were a Unix restriction prevents user names from
being more than 8 characters. However our NT account is 10
Rao,
Changing to use RQSTR channels seem perfectly reasonable to me. If you do
this, you might want to consider changing your sender channels to servers.
A requester channel connecting to a sender will cause the sender end to
break the communications and re-connect back to the requester (ie.
Rao,
I have one more point to add to Paul's. If you do NOT specify the CONNAME
on the SERVER channel, there's no MQ mechanism to automatically start the
Requester channel to induce the SERVER channel. Therefore, you will need
to devise your own method to keep the channel running.
Phil
When you run it manually, are you mqm or root? How is it started during restart?
I have had some confusing moments ofer this sort of thing...
Bill
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Leung,
Henry H
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 5:40 PM
To: [EMAIL
Hi Paul,
Many thanks for the hint. I could eventually locate the msg in the deadQ on
mainframe. However, since I can't read msg there as I can on other
platforms, I have to guess what's there. It seems I do have to have CAF to
read the msg. (I'm no MF literate)
I also tried to use Loop-back
Please
I have a big problem with my system admnistration. My email account is almost the
champion of receveid emails I tried unsubscribe me a lot of times but was not
possible. Please, anybody helpme!
Thanks
Fábio de Arantes Ramos
Extensão 51651
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ben,
I think this needs some investigation. I've just had a little play on my XP
machine and it appears that
cmd /c c:\testbat.bat
doesn't work but
cmd /c cmd /c c:\testbat.bat
does !
I don't understand this at all; I would have thought the first version
should be fine. In the MO71 code I
Henry,
I'm not familiar with Solaris, but on our HPUX boxes we built a wait
loop into the script that will look for MQ to come up before any subsequent
commands are attempted. From your 2059 I'd bet that the queue manager is
still in the process of activating when you attempt the RUNMQSC.
Hi,
I try to configure a WMQ client application for permitting multiple qmgr connection
where each qmgr has it own different certificat.
The application (MO71 sysadmin in fact) should run on my W2K workstation.
Let me explain with the exemple :
QM_TEST is a WMQ5.3 W2K qmgr installed on a Test
Paul,
All due respect but that seems like a really strange basis to make a
decision between SVR vs. SDR. The extra callback takes a fraction of a
second. If this delay is a problem for the app, there is probably something
exercising the channels to keep them up anyway. Even if the extra
Richard,
If you happen to be using Java clients, it is possible to assert ANY UserID
that you want, regardless of the Windows ID. In that case, just map your
Windows IDs to Unix IDs and have the Java code assert the correct ID.
On the other hand, if you are NOT running Java code, you should be
Hi Paul,
I don't know why you are putting the cmd /c in front of the batch file name.
You should able to do just c:\testbat.bat
Here's a code snippet of what I do. I have a comment about putting a blank in
front of the command. I don't remember why, probably Microsoft thing, but it
does work.
Hmmm...I never got Henry's response but I was headed in the same direction.
Our Start/Stop script runqs MQ as mqm:
su mqm -c /opt/mqm/bin/StartMQ.pl
The StartMQ.pl script then cranks up MQ, the trigger monitor, the command
server, the broker, the listener(s), etc.
-- T.Rob
Are you sure that if the SVR channel has a conname specified that it will
reply
to any IP address? I suspect that is what Paul was getting at when he said
If you define a server channel (fully qualified with hostname etc).
Cheers
David
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription
I'm cutting in on the middle of this thread, but I have a SVR channel
defined on one of my queue managers, and believe I know the answer here.
My SVR channel is NOT fully qualified, which is to say it has no value in
the conname attribute. It is set up that way because the customer who
requested
Yes. Try it.
-Original Message-
From: David C. Partridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RCVR versus RQSTR channels
Are you sure that if the SVR channel has a conname specified that it will
reply
to any IP address?
-Original Message-
From: Bill Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RCVR versus RQSTR channels
If a SVR is fully qualified it matches the behavior of a sender + it can be
started from the receiving machine (from a
Anybody can change the MQ_USER_ID environment variable, so it provides
no measure of true authentication, anyway. If client security is very
important, then you've got a significant challenge on your hands that
will need considerable architectural attention--you're looking at some
combination of
To all
Thanks fellas for your input. Yes - sometime back through this forum I
picked up the subtle difference between the SDR and SVR and hence I have
opted to stay with SDR but all RCVR channels will be changed to RQSTR. And
so far I haven't heard anything negative for RQSTR so I am going full
Hi all,
We have over 200 users requiring client connection
from their Windows2000 workstations to the queue
managers on Windows 2000 (WMQ 5.3). The company does
not have and is unwilling to buy any third product
right now or in the foreseeable future.
I have set up 10-15 users with a dedicated
I don't see the point of dedicating svrconn's to a specific number of
clients. Dedicating a svrconn a specific MCAUSER and sharing it among
many clients is a different story. Seems you would only need one
MCAUSER+srvrconn for each authority level.
But to gain a semblence of security from either
Title: For WMQ V5.3 SWIFT users only
To SWIFT site users
We are currently using Swift MQSA 2.2 with patch 2210 and WMQ V5.2.1 in W2K server and are planning to upgrade to WMQ V5.3.6 (CSD6).
Is this version of MQSA is qualified against WMQ 5.3 if not what level of MQSA / patches are you
T.Rob, I am curious. Exactly in what situation do you take advantage of the
fact that you can start the third parties SNDR to you? If your RQSTR (or
RCVR) is Inactive, and you can't see the other side, don't you have to
assume there is no channel problem?
At what point do you say to yourself
G'Day Dennis,
Here is a link to BlockIP2, it doesn't appear in google because it looks
like it is not an absolute path in the URL and hence not findable by page
scrapping.
http://www.mrmq.dk/index.htm?tips_and_tricks.htm#BlockIP2
Sid
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Dennis
Peter,
We have connections to a number of service bureaus and business partners.
Sometimes the users call to say an expected message is overdue and we see
the channel is down. This can mean any number of things that generally fall
into two categories - 1) triggering is broken or 2) the app is
Rob,
good points! but then you are doing the pre-Problem detirmination for your
'business' user who is expecting something and working from taget to source.
I always tell my 'business' user if they did not get what they expected to
call
their 'business' user supplier (aka the sender party) and
Ben,
If you have the CAF (Client Access Facility) then it begs the question as
to why you're routing your requests to MVS via an AIX Queue manager.
Wouldn't you be better off defining your MO71 MVS location as a client
connection. If you did you would then be able to browse the messages on the
27 matches
Mail list logo
