Re: Fw: Websphere MQ and MDB on Was 5.0 : relation between sessions and concurrent message consumption

Shanu, The response I got from our JMS guys (actually it was a lady) was :- Hi Paul, Ill try to clarify this, well hope this helps anyway, The listener port is an administered object that contains 2 jms provider resource references : a Connection Factory and a Destination. It has a pool

MQSeries on Mainframes OS/390

Hi, I am working in MQSeries on OS/390. I have to develop a Channel Exit program. The setup is like this. I have a Queue Manager, Transmission Queue, Remote Queue Definition and a Sender Channel on Windows. There is another Queue Manager, Destination Queue and a Receiver Channel on

Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux 9

Dave, I'm not a Linux guy and this isn't my area but looking at the code there are no defined values for AMQ_THREADMODEL_RESET. Its mere existence is enough. So currently you could set AMQ_THREADMODEL_RESET=homer_simpson_for_president for the same effect. All AMQ_THREADMODEL_RESET actually does

Re: Fw: Websphere MQ and MDB on Was 5.0 : relation between sessions and concurrent message consumption

Paul, Thanks for the information. The multiple sessions therefore help in load balancing and concurrent message processing. And there is only MDB associated with a session. The reason why I came up with the idea of multiple MDBs in a session : if we map this to standalone JMS programs, we are

Re: MQSeries on Mainframes OS/390

On 390 you don't use a DLL. You use a normal load module, and only specify the (up to 8 character) name of the load module in the channel definition. The DD CSQXLIB will be where MQ looks for this load module. As regards specifying the message data you do it just the same way you do on the other

Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux 9

Paul, Thanks again Dave Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Problems with authorities on Solaris

Title: Message Hi, we are running MQ 5.3 CSD06 on Solaris 8. Currently we have an issue with access to a specific queue. We have set authorities using this command: setmqaut -m QMGR -t queue -n ETSB*.** -g eai +browse +inq +get +put +dsp +chg However when one of our applications tries to

Re: JAVA app can't see clustered queues

Title: RE: JAVA app can't see clustered queues Hi Peter, The plain JAVA MQOPEN options were not set correctly (which didnt help). These have now been changed and a connection can be made. However, when using JMS with the following Queue properties specified: FAILIFQUIESCE(YES)

Re: Problems with authorities on Solaris

Title: Message You didn't give any of the PASS or SET authorities. Is the app trying to open the queue with the options to set or pass context info? -Original Message-From: Haggkvist, Andreas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 9:12 AMTo: [EMAIL

Re: Problems with authorities on Solaris

Title: Message The problem is only for this queue. We have other queues like ETSB_EDIFACT_OUTBOUND that the application doesn't have any problems with. And that is using the same authority set. /Andreas -Original Message-From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Help....

Sorry...I know this has been answered a number of times..but..how do I unsubcribe? I need to change the email address I use for this list... Thanks...and sorry for the duplicate request... Larry Murray Putnam Investments Tech Services 1-617-760-3270 This message is intended for the

Re: Problems with authorities on Solaris

Title: Message Andreas, Try this... dmpmqaut -m QMGR -t queue -n ETSB_EDIFACT_INBOUND -g eai dmpmqaut -m QMGR -t queue -n ETSB_EDIFACT_OUTBOUND -g eai This will dump all rules that apply to the given queues so you can compare. My guess is that you have multiple rules or additional

Re: Help....

Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with... unsubscribe mqseries ...as the only line in the body of the message. Subject line is ignored. -- T.Rob -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry Murray Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL

Re: Command Server Working Mechanisms

Hello Michael, Thanks for the answer. The answer to your questions is both and more. More is that we have some controlling/monitoring process on Unix and Windows that uses server-side MQI and if we were able to do what command server does based on PCFs, we wouldn't require this yet another

Vladimir Veytsel is out of the Office.

I will be out of the office from 06/30/2004 until 07/01/2004. I will respond to your message when I return. For production emergencies please contact me at: 201-251-3892 - Home 347-563-1085 - Cell For questions other than production emergencies contact my manager Rommel Belen at:

Re: Command Server Working Mechanisms

Pavel, One technique would be to write a wrapper for the command server. The wrapper uses and extends the PCF formats and monitors the command queue. Any commands that it knows about are handled by the wrapper. Any commands it does not know about are passed to the command server. The

Re: Command Server Working Mechanisms

Thanks T. Rob, Nice idea! For my purpose, it may make more sense to put messages to another queue and forward unknown ones to the command queue whose permissions must be really-really restricted. We will think of it more, but we may end up with just using command server -- it looks like nobody

Re: Command Server Working Mechanisms

The only tricky part is to edit the amqpcsea binary to make it look at some queue *other than* the command queue. Now that's a nasty hacker's trick GRIN ... Dave Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at

Moving to a New Machine

Hi: We have to move to new server where we have MQ SERIES loaded. In this move I/P address is also going to change. We have Two Queue Manger defined on this machine, and these Queue Managers have Regular, Alias(part of a cluster), and Cluster Queue defined. I would appreciate if you folks can

Re: Problems with authorities on Solaris

Title: Message Andreas, Your rule specifies that the queue name must have at least two nodes where the node separator is a dot " . " and not an underscore " _ ". So... These would work... ETSB.EDIFACT_INBOUND -Original Message-From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of

Re: Problems with authorities on Solaris

Hi Andreas, Since you look like you want to give all the App related privileges, I would use +allmqi like this: setmqaut -m QMGR -t queue -n ETSB*.** -g eai +allmqi +dsp +chg Try this and let us know if you still have any problems. Regards, Ruzi --- Haggkvist, Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Problems with authorities on Solaris

Title: Message Sorry, hit "send" too quick... These would work with the given rule... ETSB.EDIFACT.INBOUND ETSB.EDIFACT_INBOUNDETSB_EDIFACT.INBOUND ETSBXYZ.EDIFACT_INBOUND ETSB.ABC.EDIFACT_INBOUND ETSB.ABC_EDIFACT_INBOUND Anything beginning with with ETSB and containing a dot and at

Re: Moving to a New Machine

It would help if you specified your environment (Windows, Unix, etc). Personally I would reinstall the MQ software and backup/restore the qmgrs (if you are using linear logging). For Windows, if you are using linear logs you can use the rcdmqimg (I think this runs automatically if you stop the

VM Ware and MQ Licensing

How does IBM handle the licensing of MQ Series if a second copy is put on a different virtual machine on the same hardware ? Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive:

Re: Moving to a New Machine

OK, I knew that I would forget the to mention the environment. We are moving to new Windows NT machine. And, By the Way, we have circular logging( I know the recovery is difficult with it). (Embedded image moved to file: pic25477.gif) Akbar Dar

Re: VM Ware and MQ Licensing

you would have to ask... IBM but I recall something about license cost depending on number of CPU's in the actual machine so it won't make a difference. this is MY thought, not IBM's, so to be sure just ask... Michael -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Moving to a New Machine

I ran a small test and you can use the recovery procedure for qmgrs with circular logs. You can recover the mq objects, but not the messages in the queues. I saved the files mentioned earlier, then I created the qmgr on the new server, stopped it, copied the saved files and restarted the qmgr.

z/OS V1.4 CICS TS V2.2 WMQ V5.3.1

Can I secure s/390-based clusters from unauthorized access other than writing exits...? If so, how? Thank you in advance. Carol Criscione [EMAIL PROTECTED] Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com

MQSeries on Mainframes OS/390

Hi, I am working in MQSeries on OS/390. I have to develop a Channel Exit program. The setup is like this. I have a Queue Manager, Transmission Queue, Remote Queue Definition and a Sender Channel on Windows. There is another Queue Manager, Destination Queue and a Receiver Channel on

A little self-promotion for Capitalware

All, A few weeks ago, Capitalware Inc. was an exhibitor at the Transaction Message Conference. A couple of people who walk by said 'small time company'. It got me thinking about what I could do to change this perception considering I have over 40 large companies as customers. A colleague