Re: JMS error

2004-11-04 Thread GP
I am running this code on windows with websphere mq v5.3, I will increment the counter but the program fails before that part. thanks"Jay H. Lang" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have your code running..since it is a NATIVE error, I think that you are missing something in your lib or libpath. What

Re: Incorrect CURDEPTH displayed?

2004-11-04 Thread Markus Sonderegger
A grep on all source code finds not one instance of MQBEGIN. An MQBEGIN marks the beginning of a global unit of work. where another resource like a database is involved an the QM is doing the resource coordination. A local unit of work is requested when doing an MQGET, MQPUT, or MQPUT1 with

Re: JMS error

2004-11-04 Thread Jay H. Lang
Then I think that your lib variable does not have c:\Program Files\ibm\MQSeries\Java\lib in it. Or has the wrong version. -- Jay H. Lang Chief Technologist Distributed Computing Professionals Inc. IBM Certified Specialist - WebSphere MQ 651 406-2131 - USPS Office 303 277-1873 - Colorado Office

Re: Incorrect CURDEPTH displayed?

2004-11-04 Thread Robert Broderick
Tony, The MQBegin will only start a UOW with relation to managed resources (ie a Database or VSAM on OS390). The implication here is that your app is writing the message to the queue under syncpoint and failing to issue a commit after it's own self imposed UOW. If you do a QSTAT and acquire the

Re: Incorrect CURDEPTH displayed?

2004-11-04 Thread Rick Tsujimoto
A badly coded application may not have coded MQCMIT. It may require a closer look at the code and the options set. Markus Sonderegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/04/2004 07:21 AM Please respond to MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL

Migration QM data from Solaris to Linux

2004-11-04 Thread Pavel Tolkachev
Hello all, I need to migrate user's queue manager from one platform to another (Solaris to Linux to be precise). Is there some utility or support pac that can help in migrating queue data? For example some utility that can gather all data on one platform to some platform-independent file that

Re: Migration QM data from Solaris to Linux

2004-11-04 Thread Wyatt, T Rob
Pavel, MQ is it's own platform-independent data mover! Last time I did a migration such as you describe, I just set up channels between the two boxes and wrote a script to copy the contents of the queues across the channel. Once the messages were confirmed good on the new QMgr, I deleted the

Re: Migration QM data from Solaris to Linux

2004-11-04 Thread Robert Broderick
One trick is to use MO71. You can create your Linux QMGR and then define your Linux and Solaris QMGRS to the tool. Use the tool to move data from one queue at a time to the other. If you have MUCHO data on MUCHO queues this becomes a pain in the arse. Other than that it works well.

Re: Migration QM data from Solaris to Linux

2004-11-04 Thread Nick Dilauro
I suppose that even though both systems are unix the logs would not be compatible. If you are using linear logging and save the log and qmgrs files you can bring a qmgr up on another box. I've done this with Windows to Windows and successfully restored qmgrs right down to the channel sequencing

Re: Migration QM data from Solaris to Linux

2004-11-04 Thread Pavel Tolkachev
Thanks Bobbee! Will report the results if I have to use it. First, I will try to verify users really need their data :-). Pavel Robert Broderick [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OTMAIL.COM cc:

Re: Incorrect CURDEPTH displayed?

2004-11-04 Thread Miller, Dennis
Let me try to fill in a couple of blanks. First, the conventional wisdom would be that recycling the qmgr clears it up because it forces an end to all UOW's, eliminating all uncommitted gets/puts. Second, client connections are more prone to some unexpected effects because the qmgr is not always

Comparison of MQ monitoring tools

2004-11-04 Thread George J Shedlock
We are currently investigating MQSeries monitoring tools. The environment is z/OS 1.5, MQ 5.3.1. We are looking for some comparisons of products with regard to feature/function and pro/con for any of these products. Any opinions are most welcome. George Shedlock Jr Instructions for managing your

RECOVER BSDS COMMAND on z/OS

2004-11-04 Thread Paul V DAngelo
Can someone please clarify RECOVER BSDS command and Procedures on z/OS. I am refering to MQSeries System Administration Guide for z/OS Recovering The BSDS This section states that for DUAL BSDS mode you can recover a damaged BSDS by; 1. Use IDCAMS DELETE/DEFINE to define a new BSDS 2. Use +cpf

Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools

2004-11-04 Thread Karla Kirkpatrick
You might want to look at Tivoli Monitoring for MQSeries Karla E. Kirkpatrick MQSeries, System Administrator for Special Events Work: (919) 486-2213 Cell: (919) 824-1574 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools

2004-11-04 Thread Juch, Robert
Yes, especially the former Candle products that are now under Tivoli. We use Omegamon XE/DE here. Ò¿Ó Bob Juch Citigroup MQ Mainframe Support Team Weehawken, NJ 201-974-2147 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Karla

Re: RECOVER BSDS COMMAND on z/OS

2004-11-04 Thread Rick Tsujimoto
If MQ is up when it detects that it has a damaged BSDS, it dynamically unallocates it and continues with the other one. At this point, you have to recreate the damaged one, then issue the recover command. MQ will dynamically allocate and do the recovery processing. If it happens during startup,

Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools

2004-11-04 Thread Richard Jackson
Robert How do you like XE??? We still have Mainview but with WBI (FN) and the other Omegamons GUI plugins, XE may be a good fit. Thanks Rich Jackson 212-855-8297 Juch, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/04/2004 04:12 PM Please respond to MQSeries List

Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools

2004-11-04 Thread Fred Oddo
Use ITM Or you could shoot yourself,. At lease that will be a less painful... Tivoli is beast. If you are considering ITM (IBM Tivoli Monitoring) anyway. You need to install framework management and ITM sits on top of that. You will need a few servers to implement the product plus a TEC

Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools

2004-11-04 Thread Christopher Warneke
Omegamon XE DE and QPasa are your best of breed products. If you have Candle (aka Tivoli) Omegamon inhouse, you can integrate CICS, MVS and distributed platforms easily. If you do not already use Candle/Tivoli (IBM bought Candle 4/1/04 and is rebranding it as Tivoli), take a loke at MQSoftware's

Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools

2004-11-04 Thread Juch, Robert
Rich, I love the displays but it does have problems reconnecting to the various components if there's a network outage. I have to bounce the started task often and restart the Windows CandleNet Portal. The great thing about it is that you can see every problem on your system, not just MQ.

Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools

2004-11-04 Thread Pavel Tolkachev
Just to confirm that all horror stories below are all true.. :-) Additionally, the user interface is the most counterintuitive GUI I have ever used. Additionally, now that Candle is bought, there is an uncertainty in terms of what of the product families will evolve better --- or even at all.

MQSeries Queues on Perfmon

2004-11-04 Thread Agarwal, Krishan [IT]
Hi, I am having a bizzare problem where i am seeing only 4 out of 10 queues in the Perfmon. Is there any way I can see these Vanished queues on the perfmon. Thanks Krishan

Re: MQSeries Queues on Perfmon

2004-11-04 Thread Karla Kirkpatrick
If you have never seen them you might need to do the discover again and if not I would suggest you redistribute the RM, so they can pick up. Karla E. Kirkpatrick MQSeries, System Administrator for Special Events Work: (919) 486-2213 Cell: (919) 824-1574 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Agarwal,