ALL the FRs that it knows
about any updates it needs.
5.3 CSD07 on Windows XP.
-Original Message-
From: Morag Hughson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 5:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
Each subscription made will only
] Subject
N.AC.AT Re: Disappearing cluster queues
22/09/2004 20:44
Please respond to
MQSeries List
So given FR#1 and FR#2 and FR#3 and FR#4, which FRs get the updates
(directly) from PR#1
Re:
Disappearing cluster queues
22/09/2004 20:44
Please respond to
MQSeries List
So given FR#1 and FR#2 and FR#3 and FR#4, which FRs
get the updates
(directly) from PR#1 if PR#1 has a manually defined
CLUSSNDR to FR#1, which
is all PR#1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
N.AC.AT Re: Disappearing cluster queues
23/09/2004 16:36
Please respond to
MQSeries List
Morag, the below testing contradicts your post that says a PR only
List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/21/2004 04:12 PM
Please respond to MQSeries List
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Disappearing cluster queues
If all these QMs are in 1 cluster, then all you need is 2 Full Repositories,
with manual CLUSSNDRS defined between them. Those
Mike,
You said:
out of the box MQ will only publish and subscribe cluster object
information to 2 Full Repositories
can you point to where this is documented please.
Thanks
Dave
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available
:
Subject:Re: Disappearing cluster queues
Mike,
You said:
out of the box MQ will only publish and subscribe cluster object
information to 2 Full Repositories
can you point to where this is documented please.
Thanks
Dave
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided
tand correctly, does this mean that on
Repos-A, I have todefine a CLUSSDR to Repos-B,C D? Similarly on
Repos-B, do I have todefine a CLUSSDR to Repos-A,C D... and so
on?tonyB. Original Message
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues From: "Wyatt, T Rob"
[EMAIL P
Hmmm,
I think all these statements were written with the assumption that you followed
IBM's recommendation that you use only 2 FRs. But I can certainly see why
someone would think the info only goes to 2 FRs.
I
think it would go to all FRs if you had more than 2 because IBM's manuals also
-Original Message-From: MQSeries List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Potkay, Peter M (ISD,
IT)Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 2:27 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster
queues
Hmmm, I think all these statements were written with the assumption
that you followed
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, September
22, 2004 3:21 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
Disappearing cluster queues
Peter,
The
full repositories publish to as many other full repositories as they have
explicit CLUSSDR definitions for but a partial publishes to only two
V5.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wyatt, T Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/22/2004 03:20 PM
Please respond to MQSeries List
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Disappearing cluster queues
Peter,
The full repositories publish to as many
:
Disappearing cluster queues
Peter,
FR#1
gets an update (or at least an attempt) every time.If I remember
correctly, thesecondary FR is chosenusing cluster workload
balancing -PUT-enabled cluster command queue, FR#_ is not suspended,
NETPRTY on the channels, etc. I know Jill covered this in class
the refresh in a command string at
startup. I don't know, just a thought.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Gray
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 8:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
We were losing
:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
Excuse me but if you are defining sender channels for each QM then you
no longer have a true cluster but rather a distributed system and you
are back to all of the admin headaches of a distributed system. I have
no solution
, Alan
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
Excuse me but if you are defining sender channels for each QM then you
no longer have a true cluster but rather a distributed system and you
are back to all of the admin headaches
-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Gray
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 9:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
Refer to T Robs note that quotes the manuals as saying this is a
requirement. I wouldn't think it would have to work this way
My experience is that you *need* to have explicitly defined cluster sender
and receiver channels between all the FULL repositories, and that if you
don't you will run into this sort of problem.
You shouldn't need to explicitly define clussdr channels from the full
repositories to the other
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
Refer to T Robs note that quotes the manuals as saying this is a
requirement. I wouldn't think it would have to work this way, but that
is what the manual says and is backed up by our experience.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries
a CLUSSDR to Repos-B,C D? Similarly on Repos-B, do I have to
define a CLUSSDR to Repos-A,C D... and so on?
tonyB.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
From: Wyatt, T Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, September 20, 2004 6:49 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony
that?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Boggis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
So in my cluster, I have 2 groups (each group is in a separate data
center) of 12 queue managers. Each group has 2 full
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wyatt,
T Rob
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
Scott,
The quote and link I provided apply specifically to *full* repositories.
The idea behind that was for Tony to make absolutely sure the full
repositories
.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
From: Potkay, Peter M (ISD, IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, September 21, 2004 1:12 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If all these QMs are in 1 cluster, then all you need is 2 Full Repositories,
with manual CLUSSNDRS defined between
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
Refer to T Robs note that quotes the manuals as saying this is a
requirement. I wouldn't think it would have to work this way, but that
is what the manual says and is backed up by our experience.
Scott
-Original Message-
From
Puzzling situation...
Environment: Solaris, WMQ 5.3 CSD05.
I have a cluster with about 24 queue managers each on it's own host. All
are sharing one or more queues in the cluster, eaching being unique,
giving 200+ queues.
Periodically cluster queues disappear on some hosts, leaving me
getting
was provided by IBM.
Good luck.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony
Boggis
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 9:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Disappearing cluster queues
Puzzling situation...
Environment: Solaris, WMQ 5.3 CSD05.
I
.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
From: Scott Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, September 20, 2004 6:28 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We had that problem between sun/hp and z/os...we were told to have at
least one static cluster sender between full repository and leaf
]
Subject: Disappearing cluster queues
Puzzling situation...
Environment: Solaris, WMQ 5.3 CSD05.
I have a cluster with about 24 queue managers each on it's own host. All
are sharing one or more queues in the cluster, eaching being unique,
giving 200+ queues.
Periodically cluster queues disappear
.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
From: Scott Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, September 20, 2004 6:28 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We had that problem between sun/hp and z/os...we were told to have at
least one static cluster sender between full repository
29 matches
Mail list logo
