On Thursday 05 July 2012 06:13:25 IvankoB wrote:
in LINUX: change to mainfo.caption is reflected in GUI designer
in win-32: change to mainfo.caption will only reflect in run-time
Can not reproduce. For me the design form or data modul window captions show
the form or data modul *name* not the
On Thursday 05 July 2012 07:42:40 Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Thursday 05 July 2012 06:13:25 IvankoB wrote:
in LINUX: change to mainfo.caption is reflected in GUI designer
in win-32: change to mainfo.caption will only reflect in run-time
Can not reproduce. For me the design form or data
Hallo Martin,
Du schriebst am Sat, 17 Mar 2012 07:08:59 +0100:
Then there is still the question wether
Option Shadow True
or
Option DRI True
or both fix the problem.
Although it might be moot by now (though there might be lazy guys like me
not having installed the latest
On Friday 16 March 2012 20:29:15 Sieghard wrote:
_Is_ there a separate open source intel driver? The way I read the
information about the intel graphics chips is that the intel developped
driver _is_ the open source driver, and the only one available at that.
I looked for intel drivers in the
Hallo Martin,
Du schriebst am Sat, 17 Mar 2012 07:08:59 +0100:
_Is_ there a separate open source intel driver? The way I read the
...
Then probably I was mislead. So
Section Device
Identifier Device0
Driver intel -
...
actually loads xf86-video-intel?
It does so on my
On Friday 16 March 2012 06:43:50 IvankoB for-mse wrote:
We still don't know which driver showed the bug.
==
Is there a need for us to spend time on investigating a fixed 3-rd
party driver bug ?
Yes it is. MSEgui users write MSEgui does not work not my graphic driver
has bugs.
If it's x86-video-intel then yes :) Please note that Intel don't
provide only prebuilt (proprietary) drivers, they contribute to Xorg
sources instead.
(for Intel 845+ machines with integrated video, me use the
intel915-dri kernel mode framebuffer driver ( Driver fbdev
Option UseFBDev true in
Hallo Martin,
Du schriebst am Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:22:38 +0100:
I assume the xf86-video-* Intel proprietary driver showed the problem
and the opensource intel driver works? Please confirm.
What's the difference?
@Sieghard, did you try the opensource intel driver?
_Is_ there a separate open
Hallo Martin,
Du schriebst am Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:58:21 +0100:
Especially as the intel driver doesn't really shine on freeness from
...
We still don't know which driver showed the bug.
Are there many of them? The intel-based machines I use, all are configured
to take the xf86-video-i810 X
We still don't know which driver showed the bug.
==
Is there a need for us to spend time on investigating a fixed 3-rd
party driver bug ?
(anyway, the already-fixed report was got form client guys not developers )
2012/3/16, Sieghard s_c_...@arcor.de:
Hallo Martin,
Du schriebst
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 06:05:29 IvankoB for-mse wrote:
As reported, the Intel video issues are fixed in the latest Intel-DRI
version.
Which driver has problems (proprietary/open source)? Which one
works(proprietary/open source)? Has the bug been reported to the driver
makers?
Martin
Hallo IvankoB,
Du schriebst am Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:40:06 +0500:
Has the bug been reported to the driver
makers?
===
It has been too late (already fixed).
It's always good to hear of a bug that it's too late to report it. ];-
Especially as the intel driver doesn't really shine on
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 22:14:26 Sieghard wrote:
Hallo IvankoB,
Du schriebst am Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:40:06 +0500:
Has the bug been reported to the driver
makers?
===
It has been too late (already fixed).
It's always good to hear of a bug that it's too late to report it. ];-
As reported, the Intel video issues are fixed in the latest Intel-DRI version.
2012/3/10, IvankoB for-mse ivankob4m...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 10 March 2012 10:27:44 IvankoB for-mse wrote:
1.Openbox - it's impossible to make form narrower than it was at the
time when the form loaded. There's a
On Saturday 10 March 2012 10:27:44 IvankoB for-mse wrote:
1.Openbox - it's impossible to make form narrower than it was at the
time when the form loaded. There's a feeling of if
bounds.cxmin=bounds.cymin=0 then somewhere bounds.cxmin turns into
bounds.cx bounds.cymin into bounds.cy
On Saturday 10 March 2012 10:27:44 IvankoB for-mse wrote:
1.Openbox - it's impossible to make form narrower than it was at the
time when the form loaded. There's a feeling of if
bounds.cxmin=bounds.cymin=0 then somewhere bounds.cxmin turns into
bounds.cx bounds.cymin into bounds.cy
16 matches
Mail list logo
