Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] SSL mode of TMSEPQConnection

2012-03-17 Thread IvankoB for-mse
There's also a middle-tier solution -STunnel (openSSL based). Today me managed it to redirect win32's localhost:5432 to linux's LAN:5442 further redirected to Linux's localhost:5432. But it has an amuzing misfeature - no foreground console mode for the win-32 version so we won't be able to

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] SSL mode of TMSEPQConnection

2012-03-16 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Friday 16 March 2012 06:54:10 IvankoB for-mse wrote: Why it may be preferred over external channel encrypting tools (OpenVPN, STunnel,...) : 1) we'll have possibility to manage own key storage (more encryption layer,..) like FireFox does 2) we'll be able to detect password encrypted

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] SSL mode of TMSEPQConnection

2012-03-16 Thread IvankoB for-mse
What is your proposal? = In PG docs, it's mentioned that PG server supports SSL channeling provided that client side (TMSEPQConnection ?) supports this mode too initiates establishing SSL channel. It also means that client-side should control own side of key management - searching

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] SSL mode of TMSEPQConnection

2012-03-16 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Friday 16 March 2012 07:46:56 IvankoB for-mse wrote: What is your proposal? = In PG docs, it's mentioned that PG server supports SSL channeling provided that client side (TMSEPQConnection ?) supports this mode too initiates establishing SSL channel. It also means that