On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Reginald Beardsley wrote:
>
> I've run all the examples from slac011j.zip through gcc. Here are some
> things I've come across. They may or may not be issues. I don't know enough
> yet to say.
>
> 1) The #defines for EEI and EEIEX are missing from the majority
I've run all the examples from slac011j.zip through gcc. Here are some things
I've come across. They may or may not be issues. I don't know enough yet to
say.
1) The #defines for EEI and EEIEX are missing from the majority of the mcu
headers. I would assume that these should be defined for
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 04:10:12PM +0200, Andres Vahter wrote:
> I am having some trouble with the latest tilib.
> I got lib from: http://www-s.ti.com/sc/techzip/slac460.zip. Actually the file
> is now called slac460a.zip.
>
> It seems like patches mentioned here are not required anymore
> http:
Some background: Back in the day (early 1990s when I first started
using gcc), gcc strongly rejected the use of pragmas, for various
reasons you can find through google. Although newer standards
eliminate some of the reasons why they were considered a bad design,
that history explains why gcc uses
Hi,
I am having some trouble with the latest tilib.
I got lib from: http://www-s.ti.com/sc/techzip/slac460.zip. Actually the file
is now called slac460a.zip.
It seems like patches mentioned here are not required anymore
http://mspdebug.sourceforge.net/tilib.html.
However there seems to be still
