On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:35:39PM +0200, Hardy Griech wrote:
> Hey, that came just in time!
>
> One "funny" remark from my side: mspdebug would have been compilable out
> of the box under cygwin, if I'd used the "correct" compiler: gcc-4
> (4.5.3) produces invalid (?) code which makes mspdebug
Hey, that came just in time!
One "funny" remark from my side: mspdebug would have been compilable out
of the box under cygwin, if I'd used the "correct" compiler: gcc-4
(4.5.3) produces invalid (?) code which makes mspdebug crash with
segmentation fault (with gdb one can see that "device" is ch
