Re: [Mspgcc-users] Building mspgcc 20120911 on mingw - compiler segmentation fault

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Hartmann wrote: > Peter, > > starting with 20bit development I have problems to build for mingw32 > (windows). > > Build is OK, but immediately msp430-gcc crashes with a segmentation fault. > > Some analysis (see below) brought me to the point that > if

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Building mspgcc 20120716 on mingw - compiler segmentation fault on compute suffix of object files

Did investigate some more. error happens in cc1.exe. compiled a version of cc1.exe with -ggdb and -O0 and run it via gdb with a simple test program $ gdb c:/mingw/msys/1.0/home/user/msp430/bin/../libexec/gcc/msp430/4.7.0/cc1.exe GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4 Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Building mspgcc 20120716 on mingw - compiler segmentation fault on compute suffix of object files

I can confirm this. Tried building any of the 20bit versions for mingw32 (native on XP 32bit,cross on ubuntu 11), all give a segmentation fault. No idea so far. May be there is somebody out there able to debug the msp430-gcc for mingw32. Best Matthias 2012/7/25 Marc de Hoop : > Hello, > > I w

[Mspgcc-users] Building mspgcc 20120716 on mingw - compiler segmentation fault on compute suffix of object files

Hello, I wanted to try mspgcc's 20-bits support so I decided to compile mspgcc 20120716. I'm using the most recent MinGW on Windows 7 64bit. I checked out a whole workspace using: git clone -b workspace/master git://mspgcc.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/mspgcc/mspgcc msp430 cd msp430 git submodule i

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Building MSPGCC in windows with mingw

To reflect the experimental state of this release, the file was renamed to mspgcc-20111205-experimental.zip http://sourceforge.net/projects/mspgcc/files/Windows/mingw32/mspgcc-20111205-experimental.zip Matthias Am 23.12.2011 00:01, schrieb Matthias Hartmann: A windows mingw32 build of the 201112

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Building MSPGCC in windows with mingw

A windows mingw32 build of the 20111205 release of mspgcc is now available at the mspgcc project: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mspgcc/files/Windows/mingw32/mspgcc-20111205.zip Matthias Am 22.12.2011 17:35, schrieb Aaron Murdoch: Ok, I'm trying to build mspgcc-20111205 in windows with mingw

[Mspgcc-users] Building MSPGCC in windows with mingw

Ok, I'm trying to build mspgcc-20111205 in windows with mingw. I successfully built binutils and gcc, although I had to manually specify where to find gmp, mpfr, and mpc using -with-gmp=/usr/local ect. When I try and build gdb however, it fails. Configure works fine, but when I 'make' it eventua

Re: [Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure

As noted in earlier email to this list, svn for mspgcc4 is left in its legacy state in support of the WASP project. Download either the release tarball of mspgcc4, or clone the git repository. (Sorry if there is still "how-to" documentation somewhere that implies otherwise. Somebody needs to tak

Re: [Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure

Thanks for your help Peter. I didn't realise that the root PATH would be different to the user PATH, so after trying to learn how to work around that, I took you advice, at (c), and tried building mspgcc4, from the procedure at http://mspgcc4.sourceforge.net/ What could go wrong? It's only 3 lines.

Re: [Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure

(a) For a ticketing approach, might be better to create tickets on the sourceforge project instead of emailing everybody with each one. Though I don't know if anybody's going to maintain the how-to for the existing mspgcc infrastructure; my preference is to leave packaging to downstream and just p

Re: [Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure

Being a newbie to this, I wasn't sure if each problem should be treated as something unique, or part of the wider picture. I opted for the former, and more of a "ticketing" approach. Please accept my humblest apologies for erring on the wrong side. However, that said, the last (unanswered) problem

Re: [Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure

> (hope no-one is too put-out by my pedantic nit picking) I've got no problems with the nit-picking, but I am a little put off by small changes to each subsequent "Subject" line so that each message shows up as the start of a new thread (instead of being properly nested as a single thread). Hope

Re: [Mspgcc-users] 'Building MSPGCC from Source Code' - The Build procedure - su ?

> But does it HAVE to be persistent for the build to be successful? No, just for the installation. Building as root is invariably a bad idea. However, some distributions do not include sudo by default, and the user doing the building might not be in the sudoers list. I would venture to say that,

Re: [Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure - su ?

But does it HAVE to be persistent for the build to be successful? Is it not just good enough to switch to root for the install ? When files are being placed in the areas owned by root. - regards, Errol Kowald On Tue, 2010-08-10 at

Re: [Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure - su ?

On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 17:10 +1000, Ian Tait wrote: > Use the command "sudo su" to switch user to root which is persistent > until you close the terminal or logout of root. Or just `sudo -i`. R

[Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The build procedure - gcc & a grinding halt

re: https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/mspgcc/index.php?title=Building_MSPGCC_from_Source_Code the commands :- ~$tar --bzip2 -xf gcc-core-3.2.3.tar.bz2 skipped "gcc-g++-3.2.3.tar.bz2" since I don't need c++ ~$cp -av gcc/gcc-3.3/* gcc-3

[Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The build procedure - gcc & a grinding halt

re: https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/mspgcc/index.php?title=Building_MSPGCC_from_Source_Code the commands :- ~$tar --bzip2 -xf gcc-core-3.2.3.tar.bz2 skipped "gcc-g++-3.2.3.tar.bz2" since I don't need c++ ~$cp -av gcc/gcc-3.3/* gcc-3

Re: [Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure - su ?

u close the terminal or logout of root. Good Luck. Cheers, Ian. Original Message ---- Subject: [Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure - su ? From: Errol To: source-forge mspgcc mail list Date: 10/08/2010 4:43 PM re: https://sourcef

[Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure - su ?

re: https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/mspgcc/index.php?title=Building_MSPGCC_from_Source_Code the commands :- cd ../build-binutils ../binutils-2.19/configure --target=msp430 --prefix=/usr/local/msp430 make su make install I don't want to tell people how to suck eggs

[Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure - binutils-2.10 ?

re: https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/mspgcc/index.php?title=Building_MSPGCC_from_Source_Code the commands :- tar --bzip2 -xf binutils-2.19.tar.bz2 mkdir build-binutils cd binutils-2.10 patch -p1 < ../packaging/patches/binutils-2.19.patch last lines should be, as far as I ca

[Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" - The Build procedure

re. https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/mspgcc/index.php?title=Building_MSPGCC_from_Source_Code tar --bzip2 -xf binutils-2.19.tar.bz2 mkdir build-binutils cd binutils-2.10 patch -p1 < ../packaging/patches/binutils-2.19.patch the last line fails, since the file is actually "binutils-2.19-pa

[Mspgcc-users] "Building MSPGCC from Source Code" documentation out of date?

Hi, I'm very much a virgin when it comes to building applications from source in Linux, so I may be missing something obvious here ... I'm trying to follow the documentation at http://mspgcc.sourceforge.net/manual/c1685.html Everything goes swimmingly downloading the tarballs (cool name) for bin

Re: [Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

I figured it out! I found this page http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2151257/cygwin-compiling-error-this-application-has-requested-the-runtime-to-terminate and the second an

Re: [Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

Thanks for trying. I installed the hotfix suggested but got an error that the service pack installed (3) is newer than the update so I don't need the update. Brian On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Hans Nieuwenhuis wrote: > I have absolutely no idea what's going wrong, but googling on part of >

Re: [Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

I have absolutely no idea what's going wrong, but googling on part of you error message leads me to this page: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/884538 Seems to be an internal DLL issue on your system? Hans On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:05:07 -0600 Brian Nolte wrote: > I'm following the build procedur

[Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

I'm following the build procedure at http://mspgcc.sourceforge.net/manual/x1746.html. Everything went well until I tried to build msp430-libc and I got a strange error: bn2...@isd-bnol-lt ~/msp430-libc/src $ make msp430-gcc -x assembler-with-cpp -mmcu=msp430x110 -I./../include -I. -Wa,-gstab s -c

[Mspgcc-users] Building mspgcc

Hello, I'm trying to build the latest mspgcc to have support of latest MCU's. I'm using cygwin. What's the best way to build the packages? Thank you in advance. Aldo -- aldo

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Building MSPGCC

Hussain Vasi schrieb: I am having trouble using the newest version of Mspgcc. Using the make file in the packaging directory i built the compiler. I was able to compile and use the version i have currently with the 1XXX series. However i am unable to use this newer version with the 1XXX series.

[Mspgcc-users] Building MSPGCC

I am having trouble using the newest version of Mspgcc. Using the make file in the packaging directory i built the compiler. I was able to compile and use the version i have currently with the 1XXX series. However i am unable to use this newer version with the 1XXX series. Are there any patches

[Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

I'm building mspgcc on cygwin, and when I'm building binutils it does not build for msp430fg461x target. what should I do? -- _ Oleg V. Kobrin

Re: [Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

ok, I found a patch in CVS :) 2007/7/11, Кобрин Олег : I'm building mspgcc on cygwin, and when I'm building binutils it does not build for msp430fg461x target. what should I do? -- _ Oleg V. Kobrin -- _ Oleg V. Kobrin

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Building mspgcc on Ubuntu x86_64

> From: John Pitney > Newsgroups: gmane.comp.hardware.texas-instruments.msp430.gcc.user > Subject: Building mspgcc on Ubuntu x86_64 > Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:57:16 -0500 > Hi, > > I'm having a problem compiling mspgcc on my Ubuntu 6.06 x86_64 system. There are two relatively new deb reposito

[Mspgcc-users] Building mspgcc on Ubuntu x86_64

Hi, I'm having a problem compiling mspgcc on my Ubuntu 6.06 x86_64 system. I did the following: $ export CC=gcc-3.4 $ export CFLAGS=-m32 # make 32-bit executable, linked to 32-bit libs $ make build Several parts seemed to compile successfully, but gdb failed. Here's the relevant part of

Re: [Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

Hi, ...snip Is this mean 3.3.6 is better than 3.2.3? # I would take larger code than wrong code. By the way I have back ported 3.2.3's device to 3.3.6, although I am not sure I did all of what needs to be done. Seems working at least for 430F1612. I put these changes into the CVS, you also n

Re: [Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

KIMURA Shigenobu wrote: Thanks for this summary, I was looking for this kind of infomation for weeks! On Jan 10, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Peter Jansen wrote: gcc-3.2.3 (mspgcc/gcc/gcc-3.3) works, compiles all our projects ok, I think there is some fault with calls to pointers in R1

Re: [Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

Thanks for this summary, I was looking for this kind of infomation for weeks! On Jan 10, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Peter Jansen wrote: gcc-3.2.3 (mspgcc/gcc/gcc-3.3) works, compiles all our projects ok, I think there is some fault with calls to pointers in R1 (w

Re: [Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

John Griessen wrote: Is the current version of gcc recommended to be 3.2.3 for a build of mspgcc? I've gotten answers that one person uses 3.2.3, and one uses 3.3 so far What are the tradeoffs? Pitfalls? Ok, here is where I think things are, gcc-3.2.3 (mspgcc/gcc/gcc-3.3) works,

Re: [Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

2006/1/9, John Griessen : > Is the current version of gcc recommended to be 3.2.3 for a build of mspgcc? > Yes. > I am considering making two unofficial debian packages or maybe two KLIK > packages for use directly with msp430's and one for use with TinyOS and nesC > for msp430 > which involve

[Mspgcc-users] building mspgcc

Is the current version of gcc recommended to be 3.2.3 for a build of mspgcc? I've gotten answers that one person uses 3.2.3, and one uses 3.3 so far What are the tradeoffs? Pitfalls? I am considering making two unofficial debian packages or maybe two KLIK packages for use directly with msp43

Re[2]: [Mspgcc-users] Building mspgcc

Hello, Dmitry! Friday, August 29, 2003, 12:54:10 PM, you wrote: D> binutils-2.14 available on you favorite ftp or whatever. D> gcc-core-3.2.2 D> gcc-3.3 cvs' dir at SF. D> the directory mess will be fixed soon :) May be direct rename in CVS repository? Lev Serebryakov /---

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Building mspgcc

binutils-2.14 available on you favorite ftp or whatever. gcc-core-3.2.2 gcc-3.3 cvs' dir at SF. the directory mess will be fixed soon :) ~d On Friday 29 August 2003 12:46, Oleg Skydan wrote: > Hi, All ! > > What directory sould I use to build the latest mspgcc (gcc-3.3 , gcc-3.4 or > gcc-curre

[Mspgcc-users] Building mspgcc

Hi, All ! What directory sould I use to build the latest mspgcc (gcc-3.3 , gcc-3.4 or gcc-current ) ? Also can I use GCC 3.2.1 and binutils 2.11 sources to build the latest mspgcc? Thanks, Oleg